Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stafford Available


Untouchable
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I think we will trade up---teams at the back of the draft that need QB will go after Stafford and give up a lot.  Why do I sense Indy making a deal with Detroit?  Or New England? Washington? 

Oh poo I forgot about Indy and NE.

Whelp, shelve those dreams of Stafford. He's going to a winning franchise. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

Oh poo I forgot about Indy and NE.

Whelp, shelve those dreams of Stafford. He's going to a winning franchise. 

This would be Stafford's most likely move IMHO.

The Panthers have a lot of issues to address and wouldn't be an optimal choice for a QB on the backside of his career.

Not to say there isn't a case to be made for the Panthers promising to rebuilding the O line this off season to attract a QB like Stafford. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Y’all can get out of ur minds trading picks to move up, Fitterer definitely will not do that.

you have absolutely no point of reference for this, and it really ultimately isn't about what he does, it's about what he should do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

you have absolutely no point of reference for this, and it really ultimately isn't about what he does, it's about what he should do

Yeah Seattle has never traded up and I would say I’m about positive he won’t here. I think they would take who is available there and if don’t like it trade down a couple spots to get some more 2nd rd picks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BurnNChinn said:

Yeah Seattle has never traded up and I would say I’m about positive he won’t here. I think they would take who is available there and if don’t like it trade down a couple spots to get some more 2nd rd picks

I understand your view, but you can't go off of what was done in Seattle.  This is a different brain trust than the one Fitt was previously in.  I think we'll have to wait and see how our committee does things moving forward to predict future actions....

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...