Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN's Jeremy Fowler: The sense around the league is the Panthers will be competitive in trade talks surrounding Matt Stafford


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I'm not even opposed to Pitts. Watching how Kelce absolutely decimated teams even when they plan for him shows how important that position really is. We have really suffered at the TE position since Greg broke his foot the first time. 

Only if we trade back, but not at #8.  Dude, you have no idea how long I've been barking up the TE tree.  This year though, our priorities are elsewhere.  If our guy isn't there at #8 and we move back several spots...I'm game.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like we've got to worry about both the new in house QB coach and Joe Brady who quite demonstrably views this job as nothing more than a stepping stone stint actively campaigning for a guy who yields the easiest, quickest results for them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is all speculation. Jimmy G was traded for a 2nd, so to me that is a starting point to guess. A 1st straight of depending on where in the draft is there also but for the 8th overall pick the Lions would have to take Teddy off our hands also. Don’t see this happening honestly. Logistics wise we don’t look suited to be the best trade partner for any QB unless Teddy is involved too. If not thats a major sunken cost for the organization.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Only if we trade back, but not at #8.  Dude, you have no idea how long I've been barking up the TE tree.  This year though, our priorities are elsewhere.  If our guy isn't there at #8 and we move back several spots...I'm game.

Of course I would rather trade back if we can pick up extra picks. The question is how far do we want to move. 15 is about as far as I want to drop down. Now if I could pull of some first-pick trades and end up with 7 2nds and still have a pick in the first, well then, I might be willing to drop into the late 20s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TriggaPlease89 said:

This is all speculation. Jimmy G was traded for a 2nd, so to me that is a starting point to guess. A 1st straight of depending on where in the draft is there also but for the 8th overall pick the Lions would have to take Teddy off our hands also. Don’t see this happening honestly. Logistics wise we don’t look suited to be the best trade partner for any QB unless Teddy is involved too. If not thats a major sunken cost for the organization.

Jimmy was a backup then.  Everyone being discussed now are starters.   Your reference point is way off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we get Stafford Bridgewater will have to be apart of the trade because Stafford is going to want to go somewhere he can start day one. 
I am still not convinced Stafford will want to go to a team that, at best, may be a fringe playoff team next year, and I am being generous. 
Colts are a better destination and I am more confident that he would prefer to go to them. 
He is essentially coming to another Lions team with us. Rebuilding and not ready to compete yet. 
If Stafford is going to be able to control the team he wants to go to the Panthers are the last place he’d want to go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 45catfan said:

Jimmy was a backup then.  Everyone being discussed now are starters.   Your reference point is way off.

I was going to use Nick Foles but he fetched a 4th and he was a SB winning QB. So enlighten me, without bias speculation, what a good starting point should be. Last time I checked starting QBs are not traded often. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stafford ain't coming to Carolina unless the front office can somehow convince him we are further along in this rebuild that everyone else can plainly see.  Stafford has said he's not interested in being part of a rebuild.  We are just in year two, so yes, we are STILL rebuilding.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is simple if you focus only on OT.  But there is the cap, talent levels that differ from year to year, and team needs that fluctuate, as you know.  While I would be happy with an OT and understand it, I am not sold on OT as the answer. I agree that the game is won or lost in the trenches, but I do not think over-drafting with the first round pick is the only way of addressing it--especially if it may be a year before you know what you have or reap the rewards.  We both agree that you have to stay ahead of it.  Just because you take a T in round 1 does not mean that you have met the need. Teams need qbs too, but drafting them too early in round one is usually disastrous A few weeks ago, I was high on Freeling.  I still am (cautiously), but there are reasons to approach some of these tackles with a "Buyer Beware" approach.  Again, I am not against drafting an OT in round 1, but not if that OT has a late first or second-round grade.  That is not good value.  On top of that, put him in the garage for a year?  Take Freeling, for example.  Some project him to Cleveland at 6.  Really?  He is a fringe first rounder, IMO.  IF you want to give away draft capital to get a non-starter, that is how GMs get fired. First, we can address Freeling’s seemingly massive improvement in pass protection. He did earn an outstanding 86.1 PFF pass-blocking grade in 2025, which ranked seventh among qualified FBS tackles. That was an improvement over his 65.3 mark in 2024. Georgia’s passing game was heavily built on play action and screens, which allowed Freeling to partake in just 95 true pass sets all season. That ranked just barely among the top 200 tackles in the country.   Freeling earned a solid 75.4 PFF pass-blocking grade on those true pass set reps, but that pales in comparison to top tackles in the class, such as Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano. Mauigoa earned his 85.8 true PFF pass-blocking grade, second best in the nation, across 212 such reps, more than twice as many as Freeling.   What about Freeling's run blocking?  61.3--which is slightly above all tackles in the country.  So if you draft Freeling in round 1, you are getting a guy whose numbers were padded by play action and screens--but in pure passing sets and in run blocking, he was average when compared to every tackle in the country. Elite?  Buyer beware. Lomu?  Athletic, Can struggle in the run game and against power rushers.  Late first rounder-early second, imo.  Arms less than 34", which could scare some teams. Proctor?  Can play high and the weight could be a problem he fights.  Personally, I see him as the best option for an immediate starter but his ceiling is lower.   I realize all players have areas of concern, but I think you will see some of these OTs drop on draft day, with good reason.   Fano?  32 inch arms may kick him inside to G. You will respond that all OTs have question marks, and they do--but not researching the situation is not the answer.  Freeling is a stud athlete, and despite the stats, I like him, but not as depth at 19.  Proctor?  I get it if you needed your starter now, and speed rushers give him fits.  To adjust, his angle to block a 9 tech is nearly 90 degrees when it needs to be closer to 45 degrees.  That decreases the pocket, and a short QB can't have that.     
    • Stupid to say golden maye and Lloyd weren't coming just because you said but we're North Carolina? To be fair I don't think anyone would jump ship just to come to Duke either. 
×
×
  • Create New...