Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mitchell Trubisky.. please no


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

After seeing how the huddle reacted with Haskins, I’m sure things will be blown out of proportion here too


to be fair, trubisky actually had a decent year and won football games. 

Not to mention his head is on a little straighter than the aforementioned.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Shocker said:

I don't hate Mitch to be honest especially if he is super cheap.  

He costs no picks and shouldn’t break the bank.  We can always make a run a QB next draft too.  I don't hate it.

I agree with this. If we could get him on a cheap 1 year deal, how is he not an upgrade over the guys we have now? At worst, he is an instant upgrade for our #2 QB.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

After seeing how the huddle reacted with Haskins, I’m sure things will be blown out of proportion here too


to be fair, trubisky actually had a decent year and won football games. 

Well so far Rhule brought in Teddy, then was interested in Haskins....not a great track record so far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a new GM that just said we’ll be a part of every deal, so this isn’t the least bit surprising. He’d make a decent backup, so why not hear out offers.

I like that we’re going to be more involved throughout the league. It means we’re starting conversations and making new connections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have not read this yet as it was just posted. I’ll see if there is any juicy details and post them up. 
    • And the QB before Rattler was worse! People are like well he only had one year of production. Analysts and malcontents always move the goal posts when they want. 
    • The 5th year allows tons of leverage when it comes to new contract talks. It's like having 20% more control of a contract. It allows cheaper numbers, cause well you have that 5years compared to 4. Plus you also have 6th, 7th, and 8th(I think) tagged years. Sure the QB doesn't play on it, but it allows teams to lower their offers given the years of control.  The deal with penix is he's also old too, so that 3rd year he's going to be 26/7 unlike 23.  You are also looking at the best side that penix can play and needs a new contract. It could easily be he's a bust and thus wasted this important era. The failcons should be comfy in the playoffs barring injuries. Now they missed on adding a edge making a key sack in the playoffs, to having spend the 8th overall on josh Rosen.  Honestly they should have drafted Rome Odunze. Pitts, Robinson, Allgeier, London, with a *healthy cousins.....that's 5/6 big problems for defenses. Most days they'd be able to drop 40.  Im super happy they didn't, but ask again in 3 years and I may regret.....
×
×
  • Create New...