Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stafford-Goff swap is happening


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Jared Goff is an average starting QB in the NFL and is being paid like he is top 5. Year one of his albatross of an extension starts this season.

Rams made out like bandits getting out from under that terrible deal and got an upgrade at QB in the process.

If the Rams weren't trading Goff to the guy who scouted him in college they would have never been able to move him.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

If you look at Goff’s contract (for the Lions, the old signing bonus is on the Rams), he’s only got $15M of dead cap to get rid of him after 1 year. Like Teddy, if they trade him after 2021, there is no cap hit in 2022. After 2022, he’s got no more dead cap no matter what. If the right QB falls, they could easily take him and have Goff be the 2021 starter and either find out Goff is solid or gone. If the rookie seems even better then you can trade Goff who’d have a Teddy like not so bad contract with 0 cap hit for a trade. You could also trade the rookie if Goff has cemented the job.

All that said, Detroit is absolutely less likely to take a QB than if they had made a deal with no QB coming back. That’s good for us because no way we can afford Watson if that’s what Stafford is valued at.

The Rams are going for broke and they gave up a ton but if Stafford is good, they gave up almost early 2nd picks. Not close to say us giving up #8.

I'm not real worried about the lions taking a quarterback at 7. Yeah, it's possible, but I'm not buying it.

Seeing them trade out of the spot to somebody who does need a quarterback seems like a lot larger possibility.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

If the Jets stick with Darnold (50/50 proposition) and nobody trades up (still not buying the Falcons are moving on from Ryan) we could be sitting there at #8 with Wilson, Fields and Lance as options.  Yes, I still draft Lance. 😀

I think Tre has potential, but I don't think he fits into the offensive scheme we run. Could he adjust? Possibly. But it think #8 is to high on possibility. Most years you can count on one maaaybe  two QBs  becoming franchise talents

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Seems high but maybe we also were trying to force them to take Teddy or something.

Of the teams they were talking to, we had the highest first round pick.

We probably offered more than just that, though I doubt it was multiple first rounders. Maybe an additional lower round pick or a player (or both).

Teddy being part of the deal isn't hard to imagine at all. Dan Campbell was on the Saints staff when he came in as a backup and won five games while Brees was injured.

Hell, I'd still call up the Lions and offer them Bridgewater for something.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, La Pantera said:

I think Tre has potential, but I don't think he fits into the offensive scheme we run. Could he adjust? Possibly. But it think #8 is to high on possibility. Most years you can count on one maaaybe  two QBs  becoming franchise talents

And exactly what is that?  Dude can make every throw.  What offense wouldn't that be a perfect fit for?  I'm not exactly sure what you mean by our scheme.   I mean, he can hit a check down pass...that was the bulk of our 'scheme' last year

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted stafford, but I will say, We're gonna find out REAL quick if McVay is the genius everyone made him out to be.  Jared goff for his faults has been between 4000 and 4500 yards per season the last 4 years and has a 2:1 TD/INT ratio.  he clearly was on pace to be a franchise QB and the rams have been kind of a dumpster fire, so I absolutely could see them having fuged this up too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

A lot of y'all are overlooking that a good chunk of those draft picks were literally just to get the Lions to absorb Goff's contract. That's why a lot of us have been saying Teddy has negative trade value. We'd literally have to give up draft assets to get another team to take him off our hands.

Isn’t Goffs and Staffords guaranteed money about the same for the remainder?

That’s what you have to compare it to and in doing so it looks to be Rams got a slight, short term upgrade for way too much capital. Also looks like Goff could’ve been cut in 2022 without much significance.

Then you have to figure Rams are going to extend Stafford...

Maybe someone knows about contract number can chime in and break it down @stbugs. I’m trying to see an upside for the Rams other than they now have a QB who can make NFL passes.

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Believe it or not, Adam Schefter says that's still possible.

What worries me more though is we thought that somebody else who wants a quarterback badly trades up with them.

A couple of different sources of pointed out that the Lions would be in a really good spot to trade down now.

If the Lions were smart, they’d take a top QB in this draft with their high pick and solidify their future with a ton of capital. I wouldn’t rule them out whatsoever.

Now trading down and acquiring even more picks? I’d even say that is more likely than not taking a QB.

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...