Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My final offer for Deshaun

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CRA said:

If you are Washington...4 first rounders would be less IMO than 3 first rounders and Chase Young.

I don't know what it will take.  I think Stafford went for too much and has skewed the Watson conversation to a point I may not be comfortable with anymore. 

I was cool w/ 2 first and CMC.  Then maybe some additional non-first round picks. I'm fine burning some 2nd and 3rd rounders.  Based on the Stafford thing I clearly got no feel on what teams are willing to do in this moment though.  

 

I’m pretty confident whatever it ends up being you will be uncomfortable with it. 
People on this board have severely understated it from the start.  The Stafford trade was a bit of a wake up call. 
A trade for a QB like Watson is going to hurt, take whatever you are comfortable with and add to it. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

I’m pretty confident whatever it ends up being you will be uncomfortable with it. 
People on this board have severely understated it from the start.  The Stafford trade was a bit of a wake up call. 
A trade for a QB like Watson is going to hurt, take whatever you are comfortable with and add to it. 
 

I probably max out at 3 first and CMC. In terms of top tier assets.   I’m not giving up my young defensive players.   Well, the big 3. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted

You've got to go all out! The payoff would be extraordinary!

This is a guy who wouldn't scoff at moving to the southeast, it's home.

"Fit" is also important in long term decisions, Stafford showed that.

Watson needs to be the absolute FOCUS of our QB upgrade. There may be no better "fit" for the Panthers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Matthias Proficient

Matthias

Posted
Posted
On 1/31/2021 at 6:22 PM, Zod said:

My final offer:

2021 1st and 2nd
2022 1st and 3rd
2023 2nd
CMC
Shaq Thompson

 

This is as far as I would go. Burns, Chinn, or Brown? GTFO

 

 

I wouldn't give them CMC.  Even though his position isn't as valuable, personally for me having Watson without CMC would ruin the whole allure.  I want to see Watson and CMC in the same offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...