Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New CB?


Panther Believer
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Panther Believer said:

@4Corners @CashNewton22, just curious as to what I said that was poo worthy? lol

With a ton of holes to fill and only but some much money I don’t see a realistic pathway towards getting him to sign/he doesn’t really fit the MO that the staff seems to be going for. While CB is unequivocally a need unless he is signing for cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

I think he's too old and too expensive. 

If we were going into year 3 with a legit franchise QB and making a real run at a SB it would make sense.

But we are minimum 3 to 5 years away from being a real contender. 

Exactly what I was thinking, but I think we can become a real contender in 2-3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. With what $$?  We are litterally complaining that we wont be able to resign Moton AND Samuel.    Peterson will a whole lot more than Samuel.  So unless we let Moton walk (which is unlikely)  we wont be able to sign Peterson.

 

2. At this stage of his career.  I doubt he leaves the Cardinals to go to another rebuilding team.  He is going to want to go to a playoff team, or a team with a shot at the playoffs this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you're not playing you can't be considered bad. Aaron Rodgers didn't play either. I'm just saying I watch a LOT of NFL football and I can't recl anyone not named Jimmy Clausen who looked worse.bim not just talking stats. I'm talking about judging talent. A guy can put up ugly stats and still show flashes of the prerequisite talent. That's what was disturbing about Clausen and Bryce. They just flat out didn't look like they had NFL QB talent.
    • I'd argue that not being able to beat out an incumbent starter despite being drafted in the first round could also be quantified as a "bad" rookie season.  Still, 12 of those guys played more than 10 games as a rookie.  Again, Im not saying hes a world beater here, in fact I'd wager he's more likely than not to be another name on this long list of 1st round busts, but I also don't think he's even close to being the worst rookie QB since 2000.   Brandon Weeden - 15 games  Josh Rosen 14 games Paxton Lynch - 5 games Kenny Pickett - 13 games Trey Lance - 6 games, starts  David Carr- 16 games  Joey Harrington - 14 games Patrick Ramsey - 9 games  Kyle Boler - 11 games JP Losman - 4 games, no starts Matt Leinart - 12 games  JaMarcus Russell - 4 games, 1 start Brady Quinn - 1 game, no starts Josh Freemen - 10 games EJ Manuel - 10 games  Jake Locker- 5 games, no starts Johnny Manziel - 5 games, 2 starts Sam Darnold - 13 games Dwayne Haskins - 9 games  Zac Wilson - 13 games Mac Jones - 17 games (probably shouldn't be on here, actually had a solid rookie year)
    • A lot of those guys barely played as rookies.
×
×
  • Create New...