Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SI Report + Houston NFL reporter of 45 years: It's beyond over for us (Deshaun Watson)

Sean Payton's Vicodin

By Sean Payton's Vicodin,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, The Lobo said:

I get it, but my point is that’s two sources that have now said Jets aren’t it for him. “Probably not” isn’t a no, but it’s not reassuring. Like I said, he probably won’t be traded anyway. 

I don't think he will be either.

Also, I know some fans have this idea that the Panthers and Watson are like Romeo and Juliet trying desperately to be together despite interference from outside forces, but that doesn't really seem to be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Lobo Grand Master

The Lobo

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't think he will be either.

Also, I know some fans have this idea that the Panthers and Watson are like Romeo and Juliet trying desperately to be together despite interference from outside forces, but that doesn't really seem to be the case.

I think we all got pumped when we saw the reports that we were a “dark horse” to get him and the report about us being aggressive in his pursuit. Pair that up with him playing at Clemson and you have a recipe for cloud nine livin’ to crash and burn back to down to earth. Then ESPN+ released an article like @Wolfcop said where 4/9 writers picked us as Watson’s landing spot. I hope I’m wrong, I hope he comes here, but the chances are not good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't think he will be either.

Also, I know some fans have this idea that the Panthers and Watson are like Romeo and Juliet trying desperately to be together despite interference from outside forces, but that doesn't really seem to be the case.

@Vergehas said he is priority #1 on our list. Not saying it’s going to happen but we will try to get him here.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

@Vergehas said he is priority #1 on our list. Not saying it’s going to happen but we will try to get him here.

I suspect that's affected by whether or not Houston has any willingness to trade him (and most have accepted that they don't).

Even if that's true though, doesn't mean he wants to come here. And definitely doesn't mean that it's "Carolina or bust".

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Verge Veteran

Verge

Posted
Posted

I don't believe the reporting tbh. Why in the world would they limit their trade prospects to one team within their own conference? Unless Watson himself stated he would only play for the Jets which doesn't make a lot of sense either. I see it coming down to us, NYJ, or Houston. We will absolutely give up whatever it takes to get him. I know McClain is plugged in and everything, but I have not heard this, nor does it make a lot of sense.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Verge said:

I don't believe the reporting tbh. Why in the world would they limit their trade prospects to one team within their own conference? Unless Watson himself stated he would only play for the Jets which doesn't make a lot of sense either. I see it coming down to us, NYJ, or Houston. We will absolutely give up whatever it takes to get him. I know McClain is plugged in and everything, but I have not heard this, nor does it make a lot of sense.

Thanks for the insight, I’ve been trying to tell @Mr. Scot we will do everything we can, not saying it’s going to happen. I think we have the best shot since we are in the NFC and near home

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Thanks for the insight, I’ve been trying to tell @Mr. Scot we will do everything we can, not saying it’s going to happen. I think we have the best shot since we are in the NFC and near home

Never doubted that we'd want him. So does half the league.

But unless the Texans agree to trade him, the entire front office staff can kneel and drop rose petals in McNair's path and it won't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, mav1234 said:

I have a hard time imagining the Texans torpedoing a new coach and gm just to stick it to a player. If Watson refuses to budge, I just don't see why they would keep him when they will get such incredible returns.

It becomes a lot easier to imagine what the Texans might do when you factor in that they're kind of stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocky Davis Veteran

Rocky Davis

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It becomes a lot easier to imagine what the Texans might do when you factor in that they're kind of stupid.

What a way to run an organization.

I am sure Watson is thrilled that they let Watt walk as well, not that he didn't deserve to anyways.

What a toxic culture they have produced down in Houston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Verge said:

I don't believe the reporting tbh. Why in the world would they limit their trade prospects to one team within their own conference? Unless Watson himself stated he would only play for the Jets which doesn't make a lot of sense either. I see it coming down to us, NYJ, or Houston. We will absolutely give up whatever it takes to get him. I know McClain is plugged in and everything, but I have not heard this, nor does it make a lot of sense.

I don't think it is because Watson only wants to play for the Jets, its the fact that the Texans only would want to trade with the Jets.

McCain is basically saying that he doesn't think they want to trade him, but if they do, the Jets are the only team they would be willing to listen to, which is somewhat logical.

If they think QB2(most likely Wilson) is that much better than any other QB in the draft, outside of Trevor, it makes sense.  If you are going to lose a top-3 QB you better get a QB in return that gives your fanbase hope.  Also from a rebuild perspective the best thing they could ask for is a potential franchise QB.

As far as the Panthers go I agree that we might be willing to sell the farm but at the same time, no matter what we give, we can't guarantee them a QB.  Our best chance is for the Jets just to decide they aren't willing to give up much for Watson.

Pure speculation on my part, but it wouldn't surprise me if that trade example of two 1st, two 2nds, and 2 young defensive players wasn't close to an offer they already received.  Actually sounds like something we could have offered.  We definitely have some young defensive players that would be appealing, I'm not sure the Jets do.

If anything it might be the Texans way of letting other teams, mainly Jets, know what they need to offer.

I'm not convinced they want to trade him, but I could see where they could talk themselves into it.  

They were terrible with Watson.  Their cap situation is bad for the next few years, their draft capital is low, their best chance for a quick rebuild might actually be to trade him, if they hit on the QB in the draft.   They might be trying to act like they have no desire of trading him, to save face, but at the same time secretly hoping the Jets make them a deal they can't refuse.

If they do decide to trade him and the Jets or maybe Miaimi don't want to budge, I think we have a very good chance.  We have a fairly high 1st this year and a decent amount of appealing, younger players and I think we would be willing to deal.  I can't see a team like WTF, 49ers, or Indy putting together a better package.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Right. But you do understand that there is no such thing as not signing free agents, right? That's what I mean. So make some good free agency moves and do well in the draft. That's step one. If you can't accomplish that, then this will just keep getting worse.
    • CamWhoaaCam
      XL has superstar potential on and off the field.

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
×
×
  • Create New...