Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

La Canfora on Tepper's desire for Watson/franchise QB


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, top dawg said:

You're full of it, but you know that already. Preseason can't be equated to a regular season. Just stop!

Pal, a hold-out is a hold-out...

...Bell was dumb enough to hold out twice and ownership didn't "fold" either time. 

Do you really believe Deshaun is dumb enough to put multi-million dollar game checks at risk by holding out?

Show us one NFL QB who has ever done so....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BigAggieLean. said:

Yea, I’ve got no problem giving up the 3 firsts. That ain’t no thing. Honestly, I could be talked into giving up a 4th. I want this years 2nd, though. I would like to keep the 2nds for the next 3 years. I feel this regime will be much better in the later rounds.

I am not willing to give up that much draft capital. I love Watson but we can't be a team that has to wait until his second mega-deal to compete. Trading away that many first round draft picks(plus more, I am sure) is not the way to do it. 

We just aren't the team that can afford that price. Maybe in 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It makes sense why he would want a star qb. 
 

We are a completely irrelevant franchise without one. 
 

Hell, we were mostly an irrelevant franchise when we had an MVP playing qb for us. 
 

The entire organization needs a facelift and it starts with putting a winning product on the field. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Pal, a hold-out is a hold-out...

...Bell was dumb enough to hold out twice and ownership didn't "fold" either time. 

Do you really believe Deshaun is dumb enough to put multi-million dollar game checks at risk by holding out?

Show us one NFL QB who has ever done so....

Do you think it matters the reason for sitting out? Bell sat out for money, Watson is sitting out bc issues with upper management. I can’t remember, did Bell request a trade? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Do you think it matters the reason for sitting out?

...Watson is sitting out bc issues with upper management.

Yes.

Watson has not sat-out a single day...nor do I expect he will.

Hurt feelings are no reason to take a pass on $146,540,000.

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Haha not decades, but maybe a decade. 

It's going to take us 5 years just to get back to the playoffs right now and that's just with poor drafting. Zero first round picks for 4 years would be triple that at the best. 

Edited by Snake
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Oh only $110,000,000 huh...gotcha.

Luck had already banked $110,000,000 when he retired...LOL.

If you're correct and Watson does walk away from the game and retire, will be interesting to watch --- what kind of odds are you placing on that exact scenario playing out?

well, I think you are missing the point.  There are different degrees of fug you money.  But Watson already has real fug you money from football and endorsements.   He isn't a random average player the league can push around. 

I never said I think Watson walks away from football and retires.  I think Watson is willing to be that dude who brings this to the NFL and will sit a season to flex.   Just as owners are looking at Hou ownership, players are looking at Watson. 

I do not think he plays football for Houston this season (pending the FO isn't cleaned up).  I'd put that at over 50% and therefore the most likely aspect.  How him not playing for Hou this season under current leadership is constructed plays out? Well, that could go lots of ways.  Sits.  Traded.  Either could happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Snake said:

It's going to take us 5 years just to get back to the playoffs right now and that's just with poor drafting. Zero first round picks for 4 years would be triple that at the best. 

why would it triple it? The average contract of a 1st round pick is 4.33 years. It's extremely rare that a player plays for a franchise for a decade. It's also not as common for a 1st round pick to resign with their team after the first contract (56%). A team losing four first round picks, wouldnt set them back decades

I mean if you look at the patriots during their dynasty run, what did their first round picks really do for the franchise?  Yet they won 4 SBs regardless of their drafting.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

why would it triple it? The average contract of a 1st round pick is 4.33 years. It's extremely rare that a player plays for a franchise for a decade. It's also not as common for a 1st round pick to resign with their team after the first contract (56%). A team losing four first round picks, wouldnt set them back decades

I mean if you look at the patriots during their dynasty run, what did their first round picks really do for the franchise?  Yet they won 4 SBs regardless of their drafting.

Meme Reaction GIF by Robert E Blackmon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...