Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Watson at any price


bythenbrs
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yes, ANOTHER Watson thread but bear with me.

After reviewing many of the Watson threads, it appears that Huddlers are self sorting into two cohorts:  The first group would be thrilled to see Watson in Charlotte, but are skeptical about the price that may have to be paid to get him here; let’s call them Watson ‘curious’.  And then we have the Watson ‘at any price’ crowd, implying or suggesting that Watson has the ‘it’ factor that solves every other roster problem and delivers a Super Bowl victory, for that is what it means to say, ‘at any price’; let’s call them Watson ‘maximalists’.

So, time for the ‘maximalists’ to stand up and be counted.  If you are in the ‘at any price’ crowd, you are challenged as the Panthers ‘GM for a day’, to declare specifically how much you are willing to give Houston in picks and players to secure Watsons services in Carolina.  Next, explain how you will build a roster around Watson that delivers the Super Bowl.

Now, don’t be a wimp and answer the first question only, for that is cheating.  You still have to build a roster around Watson after you have traded away ‘X’ picks and ‘Y’ players.  

My bias is probably pretty clear at this point; I am Watson ‘curious’.  And I am very concerned that anything more than two firsts (2021, 2022) and CMC may set this team back years, especially if it includes one or more of Burns, Chinn and Brown.  

‘Maximalists’, you are on the clock.  Go.

 

Edited by bythenbrs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 1st rounders

? some additional later picks as necessary

1 of CMC, Burns, Brown, Chinn

- We franchise and sign Moton long-term

- Sign at least two O-linemen in FA. There are some high quality guards and centers in FA-- pay big for at least one (probably a G). Probably draft O-line somewhere early.

- Consider keeping Okung another year because the LTs aren't looking too good in FA.

- Let Curtis test the market and either bring him back or find a cheap replacement.

- Extend DJ and lower his cap hit if possible. Consider extending Robby a couple of years and make him cheap.

- Keep Mike Davis (2 years) if he's not already under contract (especially if we trade CMC).

- Use whatever draft picks we have to re-load the position of the player we lost (unless RB), add to O-line depth, speculative playmaker on offense, add another player on defense (LB or CB).

- Cheaper FAs to look at: LB, CB, DT, TE, and DE

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ship said:

3 1st rounders

? some additional later picks as necessary

1 of CMC, Burns, Brown, Chinn

- We franchise and sign Moton long-term

 

Said it before but ill say it again. We cannot trade for Watson with CMC and Tag Moton + pay for our remaining rookie contracts where we are cap wise right now so a lot of other moves would have to be made.

In reality the Texan don't have the cap space for CMC + all the other running backs they traded for and can't get rid of them while staying in the positive so to speak. So they can't either. I also have a feeling CMC would be a stipulation for Watson coming here.

That leaves us with Burns, Brown and Chinn as bargaining pieces. All three would cost us cap space this year but as they are rookie contracts its not nearly as much as CMC would.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

God damn have y’all lost your minds??

I’m definitely in favor of trading for Watson but at the current price tags being discussed it’s absolutely ridiculous. Hard pass.

I’m going on record to say that the likelihood that giving up 3-4 first round draft picks and good young players for 1 QB has a VERY high likelihood of failure.

 

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ship said:

3 1st rounders

? some additional later picks as necessary

1 of CMC, Burns, Brown, Chinn

- We franchise and sign Moton long-term

- Sign at least two O-linemen in FA. There are some high quality guards and centers in FA-- pay big for at least one (probably a G). Probably draft O-line somewhere early.

- Consider keeping Okung another year because the LTs aren't looking too good in FA.

- Let Curtis test the market and either bring him back or find a cheap replacement.

- Extend DJ and lower his cap hit if possible. Consider extending Robby a couple of years and make him cheap.

- Keep Mike Davis (2 years) if he's not already under contract (especially if we trade CMC).

- Use whatever draft picks we have to re-load the position of the player we lost (unless RB), add to O-line depth, speculative playmaker on offense, add another player on defense (LB or CB).

- Cheaper FAs to look at: LB, CB, DT, TE, and DE

 

Why would we want to spend big on a FA OG when this is such a very deep OL draft?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...