Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Justin Fields: Closer Look/Why I think he could be the guy


davos
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Ugh...here we go again. Look man this team has already danced with a guy that has "potential" and a "high ceiling.". He was a former #1 draft pick and also wore #1. If the Panthers choose to go with another guy like that. This regime better go ALL IN this time around and not try to ride the talent out as far as they can. Build around him and amplify those talents and reach that high ceiling. 

 

As for me personally, I don't want Fields. Dude seems like a bust to me especially when you get around to seeing his games that are against really really mediocre defenses. It's a gamble, much like all the draft choices but I rather they take a gamble on a safer prospect Or just go all out for Watson. 


agree on build around him 

If they had put a line around him, he’d still e here and not beat to living hell 

Fields is a tough guy   I’m not sure Wilson or Lawrence are and the Nfl demands it 

 

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I love Fields.  I actually think that he often rises to the competition, rather than shrinking from it.  I would be okay with nabbing him with a trade up to 3.  Would prefer Watson, but I can imagine how that might not work out...

I agree, briefly addressed that in the OP.  He really seems to elevate the whole team when their back was against the wall. 

Just something in the gut tells me it's Watson or Fields, with an outside shot at Lance.  I wouldn't think we'd be settling for Lance but that's a scenario where we just can't work out a deal to move up for Fields. 

We want a QB so I have to think we're looking at Watson, pick 3, or pick 5.  Just don't see us accepting who falls out of Mac/Fields/Lance.  I we targeted and did the "just go get him" method with Chinn, we're going to do it with our franchise QB.   

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, SOJA said:

Fields will not last past the Eagles at pick 6 I guarantee it. He probably won't last past ATL at 4.

If you want him you have to go up to three to guarantee it. Waiting till 5 is a HUGE risk imo

NFL reporter Chris Mortensen reports Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie "has instructed his group to prioritize making [Jalen] Hurts successful in 2021 as opposed to creating a true competition."

Mortensen reports there isn't "internal unanimity" about Hurts as the starting QB in 2021, but Lurie has been clear that the second-year QB should be given a real shot. Mortensen replied to a tweet from the Philadelphia Inquirer's Les Bowen questioning Mort's report that the team is sure about Hurts as its starter in 2021. But Lurie's support would presumably carry significant weight with the team's new coaching staff. Mortensen said in February -- after the team traded Carson Wentz to the Colts -- that the Eagles "intend to bring in competition" for Hurts. Apparently that calculus could change with Lurie's input. The dual-threat Hurts could be a standout late-round QB pick in fantasy leagues if he wins the starting gig. 

SOURCE: Chris Mortensen on Twitter 

Mar 8, 2021, 9:29 AM ET

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The title of this video alone makes me smile but maybe these sports networks can say this a little louder for the Teddy fans in the back. 
 

They call Teddy, “Check down Charlie”. 😂 If analysts know this, NFL defenses know this and never have to worry about Teddy Two Yards throwing deep on them. 

Edited by DFive
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Trey Lance... WTF???

I pulled up two different games where the majority of his passes were behind the line of scrimmage. And even watching those passes a lot of them had the WR have to 180s to catch the ball. Completely killing their momentum and having to pick back up again after the catch. He is going to need to sit two years to get adjusted. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Varking said:

I pulled up two different games where the majority of his passes were behind the line of scrimmage. And even watching those passes a lot of them had the WR have to 180s to catch the ball. Completely killing their momentum and having to pick back up again after the catch. He is going to need to sit two years to get adjusted. 

I still haven't gotten around to watching any of his full games yet. All my eggs are basically still in the Deshaun Watson or Zach Wilson baskets. At some point before the draft I'll turn my attention more toward Fields and Lance as they both seem like far more realistic options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Varking said:

He’s going to be the best of the Lance/Wilson/Fields/Jones bunch. 

I am pretty much in agreement on this as well.  IMO, and I have said this a lot, Trey Lance has bust written all over him.

I have stated I am warming to what he “could be” but have serious reservations based what he is right now.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Varking said:

I pulled up two different games where the majority of his passes were behind the line of scrimmage. And even watching those passes a lot of them had the WR have to 180s to catch the ball. Completely killing their momentum and having to pick back up again after the catch. He is going to need to sit two years to get adjusted. 

Yep, totally agree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...