Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's happening. (Probably)


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Houston scored more points than us AND gave up 60 more over the season. Waatson want close to the problem there. He isn't playing defense.

Watson 33 tds compared to Teddy’s 15 would’ve doubled our wins last year.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Vergewith all this going on.. do you think this dampers the chances of us trading for him? I’d imagine it went down from 90% yesterday? What are you hearing? There’s three sides to every story and I’m not gonna rush to judgement on anything until we hear more things and see how it plays out. It’s extremely disheartening stuff and not acceptable at all if in fact he did do all this but I’m a believer in innocent until proven guilty. Thanks for the info! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, BigAggieLean. said:

No need to go back and forth bro. They just don’t like Watson. For what reason, I don’t know, but that’s what it is.

Anyways, I hope Burns or Chinn isn’t in the deal. I’d be alright with Brown, even though I’d like for him not to be involved as well.

It would be more accurate to say that the Watson skeptics are not skeptical of his talent but the fearsome price we would have to pay in draft capital and the resulting long term cap impact.  Most of the skeptics would come around if Watson could be acquired without mortgaging the future.

The argument really boils down to ‘Watson at any price’ cheer leaders versus ‘Watson at a fair price’ value investors.

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

It would be more accurate to say that the Watson skeptics are not skeptical of his talent but the fearsome price we would have to pay in draft capital and the resulting long term cap impact.  Most of the skeptics would come around if Watson could be acquired without mortgaging the future.

The argument really boils down to ‘Watson at any price’ cheer leaders versus ‘Watson at a fair price’ value investors.

Agreed...and I am not in the “at any price” camp

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MHS831 said:

What if Watson paid the women to go to the lawyers to get the Texans to release him.

Surprise plot twist.

================================

Jeez.  I still reserve judgement.

Then Watson is guilty of four counts of suborning perjury IF the lawyer took actual witness statements that were attested by others.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Agent Blue said:

this lawsuit nor the amount of accusers will mean anything. 

this will only mean something if he is convicted of a crime in court. 

Ever hear of ‘Me too’ and ‘cancel culture’?  You haven’t been keeping up...

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
    • There's a reason Greg Maddux was never a flamethrower but still one of the most feared pitchers of all time, because accuracy beats velocity far more often then vice versa. Once you exceed a certain minimum capability, you can thrive with extreme traits elsewhere, its not strictly about power in any sport but powerlifting.
×
×
  • Create New...