Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Niners likely taking mac jones


Panthers8969
 Share

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

They coulda stayed at 12 and got Jones. They're looking at someone else. 

My bet is on Lance and they are putting up an elaborate smokescreen for some reason.  Shanahan's system requires an athletic QB.  That does not scream Mac Jones to me.

The only reason I can think of that they have to keep up such an elaborate smokescreen is in the VERY SLIM chance the Jets trade out of #2 to throw off a team like the Panthers who was in full force at Lance's pro day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BrianS said:

He will not be.  The Bengals are a lock to take him.  They've got a QB there, and just spent part of a season with him on IR because they didn't protect him.

There's a tooooon of noise that if the Falcons don't take him, Pitts might be the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mac Jones is safer than Fields. 

Fields is like a flashy sports car.  He looks good in the highlights but when you really look in to him he is not reliable at all, makes constant mental mistakes, and underperformed massively considering all the talent around him. 

Mac Jones may be a Honda Civic but sometimes that's all you need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CanePantherHornet said:

Mac Jones is safer than Fields. 

Fields is like a flashy sports car.  He looks good in the highlights but when you really look in to him he is not reliable at all, makes constant mental mistakes, and underperformed massively considering all the talent around him. 

Mac Jones may be a Honda Civic but sometimes that's all you need.

oh no not the flashy sports car people again I thought we finally shamed all these people away

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brandt's comment about Wharton was from his KC perspective when Wharton was a UDFA rookie.   "it goes back to the anecdote that Brandt Tillis had when he was in Kansas City. And it would be so easy to just cut Turk Wharton in 2020 when he was an undrafted rookie from a division two college in Missouri. It would been so easy to cut him because then he would have cleared waivers easily. No one knew this guy. They didn't have any joint practices, didn't have a preseason. Would have been so easy to cut him and bring him back on the practice squad and let him continue to build from there. And Brandt essentially said, "No, he's got to make the 53man roster if we're going to have any sort sense of credibility with this team."    
    • Plenty of us were scratching our heads about that signing at the time. Especially with our 3-4 defense. Wharton is kind of a one trick pony situational five tech DT. He doesn't have the beef to hold up against the run and he doesn't have the juice to shift outside. He's basically a situational pass rusher DT. If we paid him $40M+ and he can't start for a historically inept defense then holy poo...
    • Agreed.  300 and 2 or 3 total in Jacksonville in a winning effort would sure be a nice start.
×
×
  • Create New...