Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How realistic a chance at Sewell?

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, mickeye76 said:

Sorry I worry Slater's average height and length will make him a guard in the NFL.   He obviously proved himself at left tackle in college but that was at Northwestern.  Given the choice between Darrisaw, Eichenberg and Leatherwood or Slater I am taking one of the guys who played against the elites passrushers.  It's the same reason Dillon Radunz is not high on my radar.  Sorry I know they have talent and could transcend the lower level of competition but the learning curve could also be too steep.  Chinn did the same last year proving he belonged but for every Chinn there are so many examples of big fish in little ponds who encounter the sharks of the NFL and are devoured.

Seems like a lot of the best OTs over the past 20 years or so fit this mold. They lack the ideal measurables and everyone wants to try to convert them to OG. Northwestern isn't a powerhouse school but they play in the Big Ten so he was routinely facing too college competition. There should be no shortage of film of him facing future NFL pass rushers.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, mickeye76 said:

Sorry I worry Slater's average height and length will make him a guard in the NFL.   He obviously proved himself at left tackle in college but that was at Northwestern.  Given the choice between Darrisaw, Eichenberg and Leatherwood or Slater I am taking one of the guys who played against the elites passrushers.  It's the same reason Dillon Radunz is not high on my radar.  Sorry I know they have talent and could transcend the lower level of competition but the learning curve could also be too steep.  Chinn did the same last year proving he belonged but for every Chinn there are so many examples of big fish in little ponds who encounter the sharks of the NFL and are devoured.

He man handled chase young last year

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted

Make the right pick at 8 for the future of the franchise, not for next season.

With that in mind, and with this slate of players...for me that's whatever QB that falls that we have an actual top 10 grade on.  If Rhule and Fitts have Lance graded that high, take him.  If it's Mac, take him.  If none are rated that high, or none fall then we have a decision to make.

For me, that would be either a LT or a CB in this draft.  Sewell or Slater are fine by me, and in fact, I'd prefer them over Lance at this point, and over Mac as well, but what do I know?

Build the O Line, it's been some time since we both committed to the line, and got the correct players to make the OL a strength.

Please god no to a WR, S, TE, G, etc....

If we don't have Slater ranked as a top 10 player, and Sewell is gone, trade back is acceptable, and preferred over the corner.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mickeye76 Experienced

mickeye76

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, thefuzz said:

Make the right pick at 8 for the future of the franchise, not for next season.

With that in mind, and with this slate of players...for me that's whatever QB that falls that we have an actual top 10 grade on.  If Rhule and Fitts have Lance graded that high, take him.  If it's Mac, take him.  If none are rated that high, or none fall then we have a decision to make.

For me, that would be either a LT or a CB in this draft.  Sewell or Slater are fine by me, and in fact, I'd prefer them over Lance at this point, and over Mac as well, but what do I know?

Build the O Line, it's been some time since we both committed to the line, and got the correct players to make the OL a strength.

Please god no to a WR, S, TE, G, etc....

If we don't have Slater ranked as a top 10 player, and Sewell is gone, trade back is acceptable, and preferred over the corner.

A trade down where we can address the oline is a option I would like to see.  A for instance would be Jacksonville wanting to trade up to 8 for 25 and 33.  Then we take a combo of a center and left tackle.  Liam Eichenberg and Creed Humphrey.  Alex Leatherwood and Josh Myers.  Tevin Jenkins and Landon Dickerson.   Much like the secondary the oline needs an injection of youth.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peon Awesome Experienced

Peon Awesome

Posted
Posted

It's looking more and more likely that we could have our pick of LT at 8. People are expecting a run of qbs and receivers in front of us. 2 months ago, if someone told you we could draft Sewell without trading away a single pick, who wouldn't have happily taken that? I know everyone wants a qb, but we could have an elite offensive line for the next 5 years minimum with Sewell and Moton. Granted, if we like a qb available at 8, yeah take him and opt for someone like Cosmi or Leatherwood in the 2nd. But if the choice is trade a bunch of picks to move up and take Fields or stay at 8 and take Sewell, I'd probably opt for the latter and figure out a plan B at qb.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Agent Blue Newbie

Agent Blue

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, mickeye76 said:

Sorry I worry Slater's average height and length will make him a guard in the NFL.   He obviously proved himself at left tackle in college but that was at Northwestern.  Given the choice between Darrisaw, Eichenberg and Leatherwood or Slater I am taking one of the guys who played against the elites passrushers.  It's the same reason Dillon Radunz is not high on my radar.  Sorry I know they have talent and could transcend the lower level of competition but the learning curve could also be too steep.  Chinn did the same last year proving he belonged but for every Chinn there are so many examples of big fish in little ponds who encounter the sharks of the NFL and are devoured.

didnt slater shut down young?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Verge Veteran

Verge

Posted
Posted
On 3/31/2021 at 4:38 PM, Daddy_Uncle said:

Getting Sewell at 8 would be as big of steal as getting Luke at 9. Get Sewell if you can unless a top qb falls. Fill out roster and worry about qb next year.

and the year after that and the year after that and the year after that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Verge said:

and the year after that and the year after that and the year after that 

I would love to see something like Sewell/Slater at 8, Tucker/Davis/Humphrey in the 2nd.  Then maybe Mond/Mills in the 3rd (or hell see if the jets bite on a 3rd) and see if Brady can develop one of the 3.  You at the very least have your offensive line set for a decade.  

 

We have to fix the line this year.  No ifs, ands or buts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
unicar15 Experienced

unicar15

Posted
Posted
On 3/31/2021 at 3:59 PM, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

I would love Sewell. He's gonna be great I think. People whine about Joe Thomas and the Browns but forget they drafted a QB in the 1st round that year (Brady Quinn) and everyone would take Joe over Brady Quinn.

Mac Jones is this years Brady Quinn.

Sewell in 1st and Darnold for a conditional 3rd would be a dream.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jasonluckydog
      No more free refills?

      By jasonluckydog · Posted

      I went to McDonald's at lunch got a combo for $12. It was ok. The next day I ordered lunch from Cracker Barrel got the broccoli cheddar chicken, steak fries, and 2 biscuits paid $12 with tip. Guess which was better. 
    • alfiya
      What is a {{>>QuickBooks File Doctor }}>>&<<< How do I use it>>>? ^^^+1-844-476-5438^^^^

      By alfiya · Posted

      QuickBooks File Doctor +1-844-476-5438 is a diagnostic tool provided by Intuit to help users resolve common issues related to company files in QuickBooks Desktop. It is designed to diagnose and repair problems that may prevent users from opening, accessing, or using their company files properly. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll explore what QuickBooks File Doctor +1-844-476-5438 is, how it works, and how you can use it to troubleshoot and fix issues with your QuickBooks company files effectively. To help you fix this problem, we have some resources in this article. But if you need expert help, you can contact us anytime. We have a team of QuickBooks experts who are available 24/7 to assist you. Just call our support line at  +1-844-476-5438. What is QuickBooks File Doctor? QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438 is a standalone application developed by Intuit to assist users in diagnosing and resolving issues related to QuickBooks company files. It combines the functionality of two previously separate tools: the QuickBooks Company File Diagnostic Tool and the QuickBooks Network Connectivity Diagnostic Tool. QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438 can diagnose and repair a wide range of issues, including network connectivity problems, data corruption, and file integrity issues. Method 2: How Does QuickBooks File Doctor Work? QuickBooks File Doctor +1-844-476-5438 works by scanning and analyzing QuickBooks company files to identify and repair any issues that may be affecting their functionality. The tool employs advanced diagnostic algorithms to detect problems with company files and automatically fix them whenever possible. QuickBooks File Doctor can repair common issues such as network errors, data corruption, and file damage, helping users restore their company files to a healthy state. Method 3: How to Use QuickBooks File Doctor Using QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438 is relatively straightforward. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to use the tool: Download and Install QuickBooks File Doctor: Start by downloading QuickBooks File Doctor from the official Intuit website. Once downloaded, run the installation file and follow the on-screen instructions to install the tool on your computer. Launch QuickBooks File Doctor: After installing QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438, launch the application by double-clicking its icon on your desktop or searching for it in the Windows Start menu. Select Company File: In QuickBooks File Doctor, you’ll be prompted to select the company file you want to diagnose and repair. Choose the company file from the list or browse to locate it on your computer. Diagnose and Repair: Once you’ve selected the company file, QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438 will begin scanning it for issues. The tool will automatically detect and repair any problems it finds, such as network connectivity issues, data corruption, or file integrity issues. Follow On-Screen Instructions: Throughout the diagnostic and repair process, QuickBooks File Doctor +1-844-476-5438will provide on-screen instructions and prompts to guide you through the steps. Follow these instructions carefully to ensure that the tool can effectively diagnose and repair issues with your company file. Review Repair Results: After completing the diagnostic and repair process, QuickBooks File Doctor +1-844-476-5438 will display a summary of the results. Review the results to ensure that the tool has successfully resolved any issues with your company file. Verify File Integrity: Once QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438 has repaired your company file, it’s a good idea to verify its integrity by opening it in QuickBooks Desktop and checking for any remaining issues or errors.
    • lightsout
      Goodbye chain gang?

      By lightsout · Posted

      I don't think so. I think once you're measuring electronically, the spot is where the sensor says it is. So if it says half yard short of the line to gain, that's the spot. Now how that works with scrums and the ball moving on two minute drills and poo is anybody's guess.
×
×
  • Create New...