Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers "focused in" on Pitts?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

With the scenario they're saying, starting at ATL #4: Fields QB

CIN 5:  Sewell LT

MIA 6: Chase WR

DET 7: Slater (or....wildcard/could they trade w/DEN or NE? This would be Lance)

CAR 8: Pitts TE

--

That's the Pitts scenario I could see happening at #8

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rags said:

I cannot understate how strong I think this top 10-13 is. I'd be ecstatic with either of the top OTs, Horn or any of the top 3 receiving prospects.

Pitts can definitely grow more as a TE but he is a force lined up outside. His route running is PHENOMENAL for a guy his size and with D.J. Robby and CMC we'd have one of the most potent passing offense in the NFL.

Seriously.  He would reek havoc in the Brady-spread.  I also think Chase could be amazing.  The other top WRs are hard talents to pass on even with the LT need. 

I wonder how we'd rank it if the choice was Slater, Lance, Smith, Horn, & Waddle?

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the last time I watched the Pro Bowl was that year Sean Taylor blew up that poor punter. LOL
    • I don’t go back and look at the espn but there live it definitely said 1 shot 1 goal when it happened. I guess they had not added them yet. Still allowing goals that early is rough. Blue line is a total disaster still. Even with Slavin back. Miller and Nikishin keep making mistakes after mistakes. 
    • I generally disagree with the concept of picking a position because of value early in the draft. For instance, if there's a really good safety, RB or ILB at pick 10, I'm choosing him over a project WR or DE. Better players make the team better. A bunch of ok players will give you an ok team. The number 1 goal of the draft should be to improve the overall talent on the team. Not to fill positions of need.  Deciding beforehand that you're picking a LT in the first or second round because Ickey went down is not the way to improve the team. Now if Dan has similar grades on 2 or 3 players and one happens to be a LT, then yeah go for it. But don't pass on your guy at ILB because you have a gap at LT or need to improve the pass rush with a DE. When those guys don't pan out then you haven't improved your team. But that LB could have been a franchise cornerstone for years to come. See Luke Kuechly and Christian McCaffrey. 
×
×
  • Create New...