Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers likely trading back in the first

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, trueblade said:

Think about this nightmare scenario

JAX - Lawrence
NYJ - Wilson
SF - Fields
ATL - Pitts
CIN - Sewell
MIA - Slater
DET - Lance

I'd be looking to trade down. It's good Fitts has already made some calls.

How is this a nightmare? We take Chase and never look back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stirs Grand Master

stirs

Posted
Posted

What do we get with a Redskins trade back to 19?

And don't say "3 first rounders and all their picks this year"

If someone can give some realistic answers, it would be nice, but again, this is the Huddle

I think we get Darrisaw at 19 fairly easily, same as getting Slater at 8, and we get next years first and maybe a couple more this year

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, RumHam said:

SMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOKE SCREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN. Of course this franchise would fug up the possibility to get an immediate impact player.

This is not your daddy’s Panthers. Might as well be an expansion team at this point. You people have got to get rid of the ghost of Hurney/Richardson. They’re not here anymore.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, section543 said:

I’ve done a couple mocks lately where Sewell and Slater are both gone by 8. Would you guys against trading back be more likely to want to trade back if that happened?

Yes. Take Chase at 8 and kill people on offense for the next 5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Swaggasaurus said:

You know who I love, but is too high at 8 and won’t be available Round 2? Greg Newsome. Love his movement skills. In my opinion, you have 4 marquee corners and then a big drop. Some talent is in this draft for OL and WR that can be secured in Round 2

Newsome is going to be a very good NFL CB IMO. I could see him and Horne being better than Surtain (who should be solid).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...