Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina not done in the first


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, Lemon said:

They're not going to trade up in the first. They're all too chicken poo.

The front office are scared. Fitt, Tepper, Rhule are all trying to play the safest they can. It's why Horn was the pick. It's someone they evaluated to the point they knew what they were getting, and stuck with. It's a lot like Dave Gettleman's time in Carolina where he fell in love with certain prospects and made sure he stuck with them, telegraphing it the entire way.

If they trade up it's going to be mid 2nd and 3rd round for a prospect they're afraid won't be there, just like Dave Gettleman, unfortunately.

Triggered

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Lemon said:

They're not going to trade up in the first. They're all too chicken poo.

The front office are scared. Fitt, Tepper, Rhule are all trying to play the safest they can. It's why Horn was the pick. It's someone they evaluated to the point they knew what they were getting, and stuck with. It's a lot like Dave Gettleman's time in Carolina where he fell in love with certain prospects and made sure he stuck with them, telegraphing it the entire way.

If they trade up it's going to be mid 2nd and 3rd round for a prospect they're afraid won't be there, just like Dave Gettleman, unfortunately.

OK so they had Horn the #1 CB on their board.  A shut down, press, man-coverage CB who is as good in Zone as he is on an island.  Last year, teams completed 71% of their passes against us outside the numbers.  The team did not get off the field on 3rd down HALF of the times.  We were ranked 31 of 32.  Colleges had a 30% completion rate against Horn--think about that.

There are no CB1s available in free agency.  There are no CB1s available after picks 1-20. 

He was the #1 player on their board at #8 for that reason.

What part of picking that player means "scared" to you?  I seriously doubt a second QB or Slater would have been able to cover Thomas, Jones, or Evans.  I seriously doubt they would see the field much if the defense can't get off the field.  It was the ONLY move they should have made--and yes, they wanted Fields and Slater--Tepper wanted Fields badly---what argument do you think they used to convince the owner to sit back and let them take Horn?  The one I just provided.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

OK so they had Horn the #1 CB on their board.  A shut down, press, man-coverage CB who is as good in Zone as he is on an island.  Last year, teams completed 71% of their passes against us outside the numbers.  The team did not get off the field on 3rd down HALF of the times.  We were ranked 31 of 32.  Colleges had a 30% completion rate against Horn--think about that.

There are no CB1s available in free agency.  There are no CB1s available after picks 1-20. 

He was the #1 player on their board at #8 for that reason.

What part of picking that player means "scared" to you?  I seriously doubt a second QB or Slater would have been able to cover Thomas, Jones, or Evans.  I seriously doubt they would see the field much if the defense can't get off the field.  It was the ONLY move they should have made--and yes, they wanted Fields and Slater--Tepper wanted Fields badly---what argument do you think they used to convince the owner to sit back and let them take Horn?  The one I just provided.

Telling the owner they like Horn more than his care is being "scared" these days, eh? Lol some of these posters man. It really does my head in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

lol at 2 picks equating to "Mortgaging our future". You sure go all in against Sam.

It's a lot less about the picks and a lot more about foregoing the opportunity to pursue a potential legit franchise QB prospect due to Darnold being here. And for the record for clarification, it's three picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Lemon said:

Realistic.

Panthers are a two time Super Bowl loser and 3 in row losing season team for a reason.

 

 lol...You do realize that all but last year is on the previous regime? By all means, don't let a little thing like facts ruin your spiel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

OK so they had Horn the #1 CB on their board.  A shut down, press, man-coverage CB who is as good in Zone as he is on an island.  Last year, teams completed 71% of their passes against us outside the numbers.  The team did not get off the field on 3rd down HALF of the times.  We were ranked 31 of 32.  Colleges had a 30% completion rate against Horn--think about that.

There are no CB1s available in free agency.  There are no CB1s available after picks 1-20. 

He was the #1 player on their board at #8 for that reason.

What part of picking that player means "scared" to you?  I seriously doubt a second QB or Slater would have been able to cover Thomas, Jones, or Evans.  I seriously doubt they would see the field much if the defense can't get off the field.  It was the ONLY move they should have made--and yes, they wanted Fields and Slater--Tepper wanted Fields badly---what argument do you think they used to convince the owner to sit back and let them take Horn?  The one I just provided.

yeah, nothing about picking Horn at #8 says the Panthers org is scared and trying to pick the safest players possible.  

The safest pick wasn’t Horn at #8.  It was a somewhat bold move.   There were safer players at 8.   Probably could argue Surtain was the safest DB. Horn probably the highest ceiling of the DBs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

 lol...You do realize that all but last year is on the previous regime? By all means, don't let a little thing like facts ruin your spiel. 

To be honest, our best season by far under Tepper was his first which was still with all of JR's football people in place. Still waiting to see this big impact he's going to have on the football side of the operation because so far I can't say that I'm impressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moo Daeng said:

He is so overdramatic. It's hilarious.

You're always confident to the point of arrogance with the moves made by a team with an overall losing record. Our record under Tepper is considerably worse than the overall record. It might be time to come to grips with your delusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's a lot less about the picks and a lot more about foregoing the opportunity to pursue a potential legit franchise QB prospect due to Darnold being here.

 

How on earth are 2 later round picks going to prevent us from acquiring a franchise QB? And what has that have to do with "Mortgaging our future"?

 

We get it. Once again, the Panthers have broken your heart where it comes to QB. But let's not go overboard trying to make it worse than it actually is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. But you do understand that there is no such thing as not signing free agents, right? That's what I mean. So make some good free agency moves and do well in the draft. That's step one. If you can't accomplish that, then this will just keep getting worse.
    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
×
×
  • Create New...