Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper wanted Fields. Let his guys make the football decisions


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Tbe said:

If Fields ends up being better than Darnold, Dave may never sit on his hands again.

He still should.

Jerry Jones used that kind of logic after Bill Parcells left. Since Parcells didn't win a Super Bowl, Jones reasoned that meant he was just as good as Parcells.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Do you think he was #1? Or was that Sewell. Cause I feel like we would have taken Sewell if he was there. 

Fitterer said he was the top player on their board at the time. So no, I don't think he was their top player overall.

3 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

I don’t think we see fields start this year. At least not to begin with. It seems clear by the team choice they want to develop him about behind the vet. Maybe throw him in if the vets stink it up. 

The Bears have already said that Andy Dalton is their starter.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

I don’t expect Horn to play great this year either.  All of these guys you need to give a few years to accurately judge. 

I think he will play soundly. I don’t think he’s gonna get the benefit of the doubt concerning hands play he did in college. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

Fields made little sense once we got Darnold. For me it was between LT and CB. The best LT was gone but the best CB was there. It wasn't a tough decision once we couldn't get Sewell and no one wanted to give us a bunch to trade down. I'm glad the football folks won this debate. Even if Fields is great he wasn't a great pick for us at this point. 

It would be dumb at this point to say you believe the Jets didn’t give Darnold a good enough team around him to be successful and then go out and upgrade the worst possible position for his success in the first round. Haha! 
 

I mean, worse than the Packers trading up to select a QB the year after they were one game from the Super Bowl with Rodgers, or at least comparable. At least their QB was over 35. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a bit of an echo chamber effect developing here with these abrasive all caps riddled responses to anyone that isn't a complete shill for the staff. Here is a plain reality for you. Fields cannot develop into a good quarterback. If that happens and Sam Darnold is mediocre there will be questions and they will only grow louder. For me all I can do is hope it works out.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Fitterer said he was the top player on their board at the time. So no, I don't think he was their top player overall.

If seawell would have been there we would have taken him

then we would still have a huge need at DB....like we still have at OL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mbarbour21 said:

It would be dumb at this point to say you believe the Jets didn’t give Darnold a good enough team around him to be successful and then go out and upgrade the worst possible position for his success in the first round. Haha! 
 

I mean, worse than the Packers trading up to select a QB the year after they were one game from the Super Bowl with Rodgers, or at least comparable. At least their QB was over 35. 

I think the Jets moved from one QB to another to appease the fans and put the blame on Darnold.  If Wilson does better it will be better coaching and better players not that Wilson is more talented than Darnold.. Anyine who watched the Jets at all knows that the offensive scheme was awful and Darnold got little help. He will be much better under Rhule and Brady because he nows has better coaching, a much better scheme and much better players. He doesn't have to be all world to have success here. Distribute the ball and let your players do their job.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

He still should.

Jerry Jones used that kind of logic after Bill Parcells left. Since Parcells didn't win a Super Bowl, Jones reasoned that meant he was just as good as Parcells.


At the very least, can the huddle (for now) put the Tepper = Snyder narrative to bed?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tbe said:

At the very least, can the huddle (for now) put the Tepper = Snyder narrative to bed?

Can't speak for everybody, but I previously been talking about Tepper saying he was going to let his people do their jobs and wasn't going to try to be something he isn't.

My worry was that he might not live up to that statement.

He did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

One other thing I think you can take from this: Our smokescreen game isn't too shabby.

Several mocks from good sources had us taking Fields right up to the day of the draft.

well, I think it is fair speculation.....that a lot of people in the Carolina organization wanted Fields to be the pick. 

Verge said a lot of people were very high on him in the building.  Which backs up what was said during the live broadcast while they were on the clock by Daniel Jeremiah about what folks inside Carolina had told him. 

 I think it came down to the Fritter's vote having the biggest say.  Which is how it generally works.  Lot of times the HC or OC or whoever....doesn't get who they want.    Who wanted what only comes out when poo hits the fan though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Watching games this year again and Bryce missed a wide open XL many times and some of them were in the endzone. I get the kid has mental lapses and hasn't broke out yet, but this is year three on a rookie deal! Cutting bait now is too early. If he hasn't gained anymore trust from his QB, posted any highlights, little production, or outright gets beat out then we can talk movement. 
    • Samesies   I truly may just cash completely out of Panther football if we give him a long term deal that isnt necessary.  I have watched NFL for 50 years now and I can without a shadow of a doubt say you cannot win consistently with BY.  Way too many limitations to deal with.   I may come back around in 3 years when the inevitable happens and all parties are either cut and/or fired.  Giving him a deal before this season so you hopefully can get him cheaper in case he "blows up" or if you truly believe that he will has to be the most moronic decision a gm can make when the evidence is laid before you with different players
    • This is the one! I was at that game and all KB had to do was lay down on the corner after the pick or make an obvious tag while he was down. He had already ran a lazy route. Then if Cam would've just walked to the sideline like most elite QBs instead of trying to make the tackle.  A lot of people bring up the TJ Watt hit, but he just reaggravated a bunch of scar tissue from that play. And every Cam hater said that the running did him in and it was a dive tackle attempt on an interception that initially began the shoulder deterioration. He still went to New England later and would've got them in the playoffs had their A team not sat out the covid year. We quit on him too early. But hey how good was Teddy? Am I right?
×
×
  • Create New...