Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

General Friday Draft Discussion - Rounds 2-3


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Raleigh PF said:

Or they don't like what they see. I'm not hearing glowing remarks about any of the ones drafted right now. 

"Needs work"

"Will have to be coached up"

"Will struggle early"

It's not 1-1 or even 2-1 what do you expect lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

4 OTs and 2 Safeties in the 8 picks since our trade. At this rate we can get 4th round o line talent at our pick. Great looking trade so far.

Dont state facts, they hate when you do that. Now youll be labeled as crying..

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, klumme said:

Normally you say that there have to go 2/3 years before you can grade a pick. The Huddle can grade it before the pick is even in.

I have to agree. I have no idea who we pick but am sure that he or she will be terrible.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

4 OTs and 2 Safeties in the 8 picks since our trade. At this rate we can get 4th round o line talent at our pick. Great looking trade so far.

Implying they are only looking to draft OL or S in the 2nd.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
    • Sounds like Veesaar is entering the draft. He could always test the waters and pull out and return but without him our big men look like a serious liability. Better do something in the portal. If they don't do something about this portal madness my days as a college sports fan are probably numbered. This bullshit of having a nearly entirely new team every season is gonna get old fast.
×
×
  • Create New...