Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 3(a) - Carolina Panthers Select BYU OT Brady Christensen


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

I watched a lot of his tape last night--he catches instead of attacks a lot.  Maybe they can fix it.  He needs to start within a year, and we all know that would give him 6-7 years as an effective OL.  Yes, moving inside is possible.  I still hope we draft Forsythe, Hudson, or maybe even Smith from ECU.  Ball is another idea.  Doyle for Mof Ohio--we still have options.

Christensen is not going to be a world beater, but I am not confident that LT is fixed. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I watched a lot of his tape last night--he catches instead of attacks a lot.  Maybe they can fix it.  He needs to start within a year, and we all know that would give him 6-7 years as an effective OL.  Yes, moving inside is possible.  I still hope we draft Forsythe, Hudson, or maybe even Smith from ECU.  Ball is another idea.  Doyle for Mof Ohio--we still have options.

Christensen is not going to be a world beater, but I am not confident that LT is fixed. 

 

Hudson is unathletic AF if i remember correctly.

Doyle or Forsythe would be the best options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw Brady play in HS.  A rare athlete who excelled in Baseball, Basketball, and Football. I saw him steal a ball in HS, beat gaurds down the floor and dunk it so hard the basket shook for 30 seconds.  He is an athlete, who can protect Sam.  Great work ethic, team first, kind of man. He will love Charlotte, and they will love him. He is a first team All-American and a steal in the third round. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, hepcat said:

I also wouldn't rule out Okung coming back.

The issue with Okung is how many game we would get out of him if we do bring him back.  When he's on the field, he's fine.  But he has played 13 games over the last two seasons.  Unfortunately, he forces us to have depth whether we want it or not.

And for whatever reason, this team does not seem to want depth at LT.  I sometimes wonder if their solution is to just not have a LT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

The issue with Okung is how many game we would get out of him if we do bring him back.  When he's on the field, he's fine.  But he has played 13 games over the last two seasons.  Unfortunately, he forces us to have depth whether we want it or not.

And for whatever reason, this team does not seem to want depth at LT.  I sometimes wonder if their solution is to just not have a LT.

They have just made poor choices at LT. But I think if Sewell had been there at 8, he’d have been the pick.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The good thing about replacing a bad player is you really have nothing to lose. If their replacement is bad so what, you didn't get much worse and probably saved money.  
    • I came over from the old Panthers Insider site. When Fox Sports bought that platform it slowly just started dying plus the guy who ran that site was dealing with some pretty significant health issues so the whole thing just slowly fell apart. Quite a few of us migrated over here. Not sure how many are still around.  I miss that place. It struck a nice balance of having enough active posters to keep productive conversation flowing but didn't have so much traffic that you end up with a lot of trolling BS. This place is getting there though since we shutdown new registrations but at some point we're going to have to open it back up or we'll watch this place slowly die off too as posters fall off for one reason or another. We just have to figure out a way to filter out the spam bots. It was a never ending battle to ban the spam bots to keep then from overrunning the site. You'd think they'd be a little more strategic. I mean, if you fill a site with nothing but spam people are just going to stop coming so it's not a sustainable model. But nope, every one of them makes dozens of duplicate threads filling up pages upon pages as soon as their account goes live.
    • lol...I don't remember that.  Although recalling what I had for breakfast yesterday is sometimes a challenge.  Hope it was a positive thing.
×
×
  • Create New...