Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN's Marcus Spears on Matt Rhule


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Rhule ain't got long for this job. He just traded a coach maker for a coach killer. Sam's working on his third coach in three years, with one going on to build a Super Bowl winning defense. Talk about seeing ghost; there's going to be some reunions going on with Sam having to face old nemesis from the AFC East. You folks will be lucky to put two wins together this year, and by this time next year yall will be looking for another qb, and possibly another coach while having to pay Sam's 5th year guarantee. 

Can't blame Hurney for this one.

This guy jumped on the Cam bandwagon in 2017 and got disappointed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem I have with trolls is when they're lazy.

If you're going to commit to the bit - which is obviously no way to go through life, but you do you - at least put some effort in.

Calling Teddy Bridgewater a 'coach maker' is just absurd. You're drawing no-one in when you lead off with that.

F - do better. 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of this is Jets 2.0, with the same blindness and soon to be the same excuse making.

Teddy took a rookie coach to the playoffs in Minn. He helped save the season in New Orleans after Brees got hurt. And he got his college coach a fat contract with the University of Texas while he was at Louisville. He also got some morons here thinking that Rhule can develop a player that two other coaches have already tried and failed.

Embrace the suck. With one move the Panthers have established themselves as the worse team in the league, and the new general manager will dump the coach before he's dumped the following year. Jets 2.0.   

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it’s slightly understated, but, I think this defenses potential is really underthought. Maybe not by this board by some, but nationally... it doesn’t see what’s brewing.

On the line youve Burns, YGM, Brown, Fox, Nixon, Jones.. along with Reddick playing a specialist/edge joker role.

We can do a lot worse than Shaq, Perryman, and Carter at LB and LB is becoming increasingly not as important as it used to be.

This secondary depth is the strongest I’ve seen in a long time. Chinn, Horn, Bouye, Jackson, Burris, and see what we get out of Taylor, Franklin, Robinson, and Pride. Everyone and their momma is talking about Darnold, good and bad, but man this defense is gonna be fun.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is trying so hard to troll, but isn’t very good at it...  

Here is a little advice. You have to make it just slightly believable you might be for real with the slightest shades of truths in your troll. It either gets a good chuckle or response. That’s like Trolling 101.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Eric4280 said:

I think it’s slightly understated, but, I think this defenses potential is really underthought. Maybe not by this board by some, but nationally... it doesn’t see what’s brewing.

On the line youve Burns, YGM, Brown, Fox, Nixon, Jones.. along with Reddick playing a specialist/edge joker role.

We can do a lot worse than Shaq, Perryman, and Carter at LB and LB is becoming increasingly not as important as it used to be.

This secondary depth is the strongest I’ve seen in a long time. Chinn, Horn, Bouye, Jackson, Burris, and see what we get out of Taylor, Franklin, Robinson, and Pride. Everyone and their momma is talking about Darnold, good and bad, but man this defense is gonna be fun.

Burns has never had a legit secondary behind him. He could have a huge year! Add another year for Chinn, Brown, and YGM to develop and it’s going to be a fun defense to watch. I can totally see Horn and Jackson feeding off each other!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Burns has never had a legit secondary behind him. He could have a huge year! Add another year for Chinn, Brown, and YGM to develop and it’s going to be a fun defense to watch. I can totally see Horn and Jackson feeding off each other!

I agree wholeheartedly. It’s gonna be a dynamic, fun, competitive defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Rhule ain't got long for this job. He just traded a coach maker for a coach killer. Sam's working on his third coach in three years, with one going on to build a Super Bowl winning defense. Talk about seeing ghost; there's going to be some reunions going on with Sam having to face old nemesis from the AFC East. You folks will be lucky to put two wins together this year, and by this time next year yall will be looking for another qb, and possibly another coach while having to pay Sam's 5th year guarantee. 

Can't blame Hurney for this one.

Your guy, Teddy B, sucked. Let it go already. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, methodtoll said:

I can see ourselves being in the same mold of the Buffalo Bills. It took time for them to build but slowly getting a foundation in place to take over as the top dog in the AFC East. 

The irony. Bills legitimately are the depo for ex panther players, coach, and GM. To become what we could have been if we jettisoned nippleshorts (who became Hurney), and riverboat earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

of all that

 

7 hours ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:
7 hours ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Sam's working on his third coach in three years, with one going on to build a Super Bowl winning defense.

 Last season we had a new HC, OC and DC and no real preseason due to Covid.

 

And in spite of all this...

...Teddy is the devil -- LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...