Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sooo what's the plan for LT?


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Wouldn't bet on Little being in that mix.

I'd be shocked if he wasn't given a shot, Rhule talked about him being in the mix this offseason. It's make or break for him. He'll probably either be the backup at LT or he'll be cut during training camp. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty obvious they feel okay with Erving there in the short-term. They'll give Christiansen and Scott a chance to push him, but I will be surprised if it is anyone but Erving at LT for Week One. I think their ideal for Week One right now is Erving/Christiansen/Paradis/Elflein/Moton across the board. If Erving struggles and Christiansen is playing well, maybe you kick him out later in the year and give one of the young guards a chance to step in at LG. Or, maybe Scott gets his shot at LT again and everyone else stays put. The important thing is that they actually have options this year. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hepcat said:

I'd be shocked if he wasn't given a shot, Rhule talked about him being in the mix this offseason. It's make or break for him. He'll probably either be the backup at LT or he'll be cut during training camp. 

Gantt, just after the draft...

At left tackle, it could be Erving. Or Daley. Or Scott. Or Christensen.

A post draft look at the Panthers roster

I don't think little was left off that list because Gantt forgot him.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smittymoose said:

It's pretty obvious they feel okay with Erving there in the short-term. They'll give Christiansen and Scott a chance to push him, but I will be surprised if it is anyone but Erving at LT for Week One. I think their ideal for Week One right now is Erving/Christiansen/Paradis/Elflein/Moton across the board. If Erving struggles and Christiansen is playing well, maybe you kick him out later in the year and give one of the young guards a chance to step in at LG. Or, maybe Scott gets his shot at LT again and everyone else stays put. The important thing is that they actually have options this year. 

I don't think we'll play Christiansen at LG if we think he's the future at LT. At best, Erving is a stop gap. I think they'll want Christiansen preparing for that spot as soon as he's ready.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BrianS said:

The fact that we took Horn with both Darrisaw and Slater still on the board lets me know they were at least comfortable short term with the vets they already had.

I think they drafted like you're meant to draft - take the guy you think is going to be an All-Pro when it's your pick, rather than the guy you 'need' but he's only going to be a solid starter.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

==

Scott with a good LG (maybe Elflein) is going to be better than with Reed, who sucked.  Irvin has played all positions, so maybe he is the plug and play until Brady Christensen loses his baby teeth.  I think we will do what we have to do (Tremble) until then, and hope for the best.

Good question, Verge.  LT is far from settled.  I think Brady is the man, and he may take a year to get there.  Moton was a second round RT and he did not start as a rookie.  (But that was RR)

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think we'll play Christiansen at LG if we think he's the future at LT. At best, Erving is a stop gap. I think they'll want Christiansen preparing for that spot as soon as he's ready.

I think they'll throw them all into the mix in TC and play the best five.

Maybe this year Christensen isn't the best LT, but if he's one of the two best Gs he'll play there.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

==

Scott with a good LG (maybe Elflein) is going to be better than with Reed, who sucked.  Irvin has played all positions, so maybe he is the plug and play until Brady Christensen loses his baby teeth.  I think we will do what we have to do (Tremble) until then, and hope for the best.

Good question, Verge.  LT is far from settled.  I think Brady is the man, and he may take a year to get there.  Moton was a second round RT and he did not start as a rookie.  (But that was RR)

Bro I can’t take you seriously anymore lmfao

EA4FAB61-5CBE-48EE-985C-EC421E6B52B9.gif

Edited by jayflip
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, jayflip said:

Bro I can’t take you seriously anymore lmfao

EA4FAB61-5CBE-48EE-985C-EC421E6B52B9.gif

Me Neither.  I post something, and then see it later, and say, "What does the idiot have to say now?"  Then I realize--I am the idiot. 

Lost a bet with Fua, who cheated somehow. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Little will be cut due to numbers--we added 3 OL (Christensen, Brown, and Moore)  and I think all make the roster.  Since I figure we keep no more than 10 OL (Moton, Paradis, Miller, Elflien, Irving, Daley, and Scott)   Little has no future contract coming, might as well cut him and let him go to Buffalo or Washington.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If Mays has a market, which it seems he will, he's gone.  I think we bring back Nijman for too much money to be cautious at LT, Corbett comes back cheap since he's already said he wants to live in CLT, and Christensen eventually gets re-signed with the hopes he can be depth at some point.  Draft an OT, draft a C. The OL might be rough for stretches next year, but time to get some youth there to prepare for Bryce in 2027 or the next QB. I still think we compete for the division in 2026 and can go back to the playoffs unlike the oddsmakers in Vegas, but the *real* year is 2027 IMO. Either Bryce has proven it and he's the QB looking at his 2nd contract, or we have the ready-made team for the next rookie QB or Vet we trade for. 
    • The Panthers are going to have a lot more flexibility in free agency than it looks like at first glance. On paper, the cap space might seem tight, but there are several obvious restructure candidates that could easily free up significant room. Between converting base salaries into signing bonuses and spreading cap hits out over future years, Carolina could realistically clear $60–80 million in additional space if they wanted to be aggressive. That kind of flexibility means they’re not stuck. They can extend key young pieces, add help along the offensive line, upgrade the defense, and still be strategic about value signings. Letting Cade Mays test the market makes sense from a leverage standpoint. If he’s willing to come back on a team-friendly deal, great, continuity on the line matters. But if his market price climbs, the Panthers should absolutely explore upgrades. The point is, this front office isn’t boxed in. With cap maneuvering and smart structuring, they have the ability to be active players in free agency rather than sitting on the sidelines like we are used too. 
×
×
  • Create New...