Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looks like Watson will settle lawsuits


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

Was there ever any real doubt this would all be concluded with a settlement? They should have just skipped to this part and gotten it over with. If he actually did anything wrong hopefully he learned next time he needs a massage with a happy ending to just go one of those shady neon sign light on legit jack shacks to keep things simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Snake said:

Pretty much called this. Innocent or guilty its just easier to pay them off.

Yeah and it's pretty fuged up regardless. If he's innocent it's fuged up that he's essentially forced to pay because the alternative of fighting it is a long process with no guarantees that he'll actually be found innocent as it's a he said she said case. And if he's guilty it's fuged up that these victims would just accept money to let him walk free. fuged up all around.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, t96 said:

Yeah and it's pretty fuged up regardless. If he's innocent it's fuged up that he's essentially forced to pay because the alternative of fighting it is a long process with no guarantees that he'll actually be found innocent as it's a he said she said case. And if he's guilty it's fuged up that these victims would just accept money to let him walk free. fuged up all around.

Pretty much how it goes this day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, t96 said:

Yeah and it's pretty fuged up regardless. If he's innocent it's fuged up that he's essentially forced to pay because the alternative of fighting it is a long process with no guarantees that he'll actually be found innocent as it's a he said she said case. And if he's guilty it's fuged up that these victims would just accept money to let him walk free. fuged up all around.

IMO, If they accept money and none of them say "I don't want no stinking settlement", it just proves that they were all lying out of their ass in order to get paid.  

 

Edited by glenwo2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm....I take it mrcompletely11 didn't like that take of mine.   🤔

Perhaps he'd like to tell me in his own words why he didn't like it instead of just lurking and reacting....  Just saying...

I mean...since they were victims in this, they should NEVER accept settlements if Watson did this crap to them.  They should've gone after him since he committed a Criminal act to them.  

Sorry, but It's difficult to be sympathetic to them if they just took the money. 

Plus, it makes them look less believable that they were victims and more that they were looking to cash in on a high-profile Highly-Paid Professional Sports Athlete.

It is what it is.

Edited by glenwo2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Hmm....I take it mrcompletely11 didn't like that take of mine.   🤔

Perhaps he'd like to tell me in his own words why he didn't like it instead of just lurking and reacting....  Just saying...

I mean...since they were victims in this, they should NEVER accept settlements if Watson did this crap to them.  They should've gone after him since he committed a Criminal act to them.  

Sorry, but It's difficult to be sympathetic to them if they just took the money. 

Plus, it makes them look less believable that they were victims and more that they were looking to cash in on a high-profile Highly-Paid Professional Sports Athlete.

It is what it is.


Maybe they just want Watson to acknowledge what he did and this settlement includes that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't necessarily think he will be moved, I would currently be leaning against that notion. I think a lot will depend on the coaching situation. Carroll certainly can't be thinking about wanting to go through a serious strip down and overhaul, so the longer he plans to remain, the less likely I think Crosby gets moved.
    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
×
×
  • Create New...