Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Confidential - A Look Into the Panthers Offseason


DeSim
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have watched 3-4 times. Would love more

of the 2nd-3rd round pick intel. At one point rule talks about if they get cleaned out, Marshall Jr. will be on the board, and they were trying to secure a guarantee from 2 teams drafting in front that they didn’t get.... would love more of the Conversation with the Jets about Sam Darnold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Martin said:

Voth is confirming it wasn’t Fields:


image.thumb.png.a64130f5777588edb16c30efc3559702.png

Notice how Voth doesn’t ever rule out Fiesta Taco Salad.   I’m gonna dig in.  Get ready for an I told you if we get a Taco Bell partnership.  

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Tbe said:


This is stupid. They had no issue naming a bunch of players they were thinking about taking.

Why would they blur out a name unless they thought it would stir up some poo?

The name was Fields and they are just covering their butts in case Fields outplays Sam.

As much as I want to say you're wrong, there still is the question as to why they would blur out the names at all in the first place?

I don't know.....

....but you know what?  Who friggin' cares at this point?

Sam is our QB and Fields is in Chicago.

How Fields does in Chicago has no bearing on our team.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

As much as I want to say you're wrong, there still is the question as to why they would blur out the names at all in the first place?

I don't know.....

The didn't. The camera moves off the board toward Rhule so it's in motion at the time of the screencap.

People have their tinfoil hats wound a little too tightly today.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The didn't. The camera moves off the board toward Rhule so it's in motion at the time of the screencap.

People have their tinfoil hats wound a little too tightly today.

 

This is why teams don't normally do this.

Fans can never have enough information - they won't stop until the Panthers release their Draft board and all the scouting reports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The didn't. The camera moves off the board toward Rhule so it's in motion at the time of the screencap.

People have their tinfoil hats wound a little too tightly today.

 

Ah...I thought they blurred it blurred it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

This is why teams don't normally do this.

Fans can never have enough information - they won't stop until the Panthers release their Draft board and all the scouting reports.

No, the fans are just fine and have expressed how happy they are with this video and how much they enjoyed it and how much they love how we did things and how excited they are about this franchise moving forward. 

The idiots and trolls are the ones that won't stop until the Panthers release their draft board and all the scouting reports. 

But I have aggressively started my own personal Huddle cancel culture. People can say whatever they want and people that enjoy arguing over nonsense can feel free to have fun but that's not why I'm here. 

The great thing about the of season is it gives you an opportunity to identify posters and choose their validity to your experience. I was hesitant at first but now I have fully embraced my personal reason for being here.

It started with the negative Nancies. The ones that just wait for anything positive and must respond with something negative. Not enjoyable to me. Ignored.

Now it's the Fields' fanboys. Not the people who like Fields but the ones that can't get over the fact that our organization didn't and can't get over themselves long enough to not spew their anger at every opportunity they get. Ignored. 

My overall experience here just improves daily. I like legitimate discussions but I don't like arguments that play like broken records. Trolls only exist if you can see them. If not then they are only a figment of your imagination. 

Much like our interest in Fields. 

Edited by Panthers Rhule
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 1usctrojan said:

Haha, lightweight.  I moved from SoCal to Tennessee a little over a year ago.  The Mexican food is so awful here.  I now make everything from scratch.  My kids love it though.  

Nobody goes to TN for tacos.  You can get a country record deal, a fifth of Old No.7, and southern food.  (Fried everything). That’s TN.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...