Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting notes from The Athletic Bob McGinn's article


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Trainwreck said:

You’re trolling if you dont believe that Luke was a perfect prospect. Player on the field + person off the field + smart on the field and classroom = PERFECT

https://www.google.com/amp/s/pantherswire.usatoday.com/2018/02/02/watch-luke-kuechly-reads-his-ridiculous-nfl-draft-profile/amp/
 

I mean just Google this poo and stop trying to troll. Here is Luke reading his draft profile about “inflated stats” “lack of speed” and “poor strength” just go to the Bears forum and stay attached to Fields’ nuts.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Trainwreck said:

You guys just quit. Luke is a once in a generation MLB. Would’ve been a locked for HOF if he would just play for another 2-3 years. There’s a reason why he went 9th overall in the draft. I don’t care what some stupid scouts say about Luke pre draft. He was a perfect prospect.

You're not even good at trolling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Trainwreck said:

You guys just quit. Luke is a once in a generation MLB. Would’ve been a locked for HOF if he would just play for another 2-3 years. There’s a reason why he went 9th overall in the draft. I don’t care what some stupid scouts say about Luke pre draft. He was a perfect prospect.

Yes, he is a generational MLB, based on his career. We were discussing the fact that no one is a perfect prospect.

See analysis from before the draft:

-routinely driven off the ball

-Kuechly takes too many false steps. 

-No player makes more tackles, but rarely are these clean tackles where Kuechly read the play and made a dynamite pursuit and form tackle.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1031882-luke-kuechly-2012-nfl-draft-scouting-report

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Trainwreck said:

You guys just quit. Luke is a once in a generation MLB. Would’ve been a locked for HOF if he would just play for another 2-3 years. There’s a reason why he went 9th overall in the draft. I don’t care what some stupid scouts say about Luke pre draft. He was a perfect prospect.

No one is saying he wasn’t a great HOF MLB. You are pivoting because I showed you scouts didn’t have him as a perfect prospect. I mean it’s a video of Luke himself reading it. So clearly some fans could have listened to similar scouts and been disappointed at the pick when it happened. He turned out to be one of the NFL’s best players, but that’s not what you were debating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Santee_Panther said:

Yes, he is a generational MLB, based on his career. We were discussing the fact that no one is a perfect prospect.

See analysis from before the draft:

-routinely driven off the ball

-Kuechly takes too many false steps. 

-No player makes more tackles, but rarely are these clean tackles where Kuechly read the play and made a dynamite pursuit and form tackle.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1031882-luke-kuechly-2012-nfl-draft-scouting-report

 

He knows he was proven wrong and is trying hard to pivot to Luke’s career which isn’t even a debate.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Santee_Panther said:

Yes, he is a generational MLB, based on his career. We were discussing the fact that no one is a perfect prospect.

See analysis from before the draft:

-routinely driven off the ball

-Kuechly takes too many false steps. 

-No player makes more tackles, but rarely are these clean tackles where Kuechly read the play and made a dynamite pursuit and form tackle.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1031882-luke-kuechly-2012-nfl-draft-scouting-report

 

I wouldn't quote the Bleacher Report pretty much ever.

That said I loved Kuechly, but I was worried that he was a wrap and drag tackler. I wasn't sure how that'd translate to the NFL where everyone is bigger and faster. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Potential Title IX Violations could point to a whole array of things. Without specifics details it easy to assume sexual harassment or something of the sort, but complaints (or violations) could involve and sort of gender bias of the program or school, as well as a student. Without details its hard to know how Dayvion was exactly involved in "whatever", these off the field issues were. I would hope that Rhule and the scouts vetted Dayvion and got more information from the school about what happened than the press did. IF Dayvion plays well and becomes a star you better believe "whatever it was" will come to light sooner or later.

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kueckly was a junior when he was drafted and he came from BC which isn't exactly a football powerhouse and he wasn't really hyped like many guys. So most of what folks saw were the stats where he was second in tackles his freshman year and 1st his sophomore year. But we had a good debate between those who thought he was good but not worth a top 10 pick and folks like me who where huge fans of him well before the draft. I said then that he was not only a top 10 pick but he was the best defensive player in the draft that year at any position. That if we got him at 9 it would be a steal. 

Edited by panthers55
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Beck is likely to be a Day 2 or 3 guy.
    • Schlereth calling us back to back....somebody call up Morgan!  Schlereth got that dawg in him!
    • I was just thinking — if Bryce had been the #1 overall pick without the massive trade-up, there wouldn’t be nearly this much anger and resentment toward him. The problem isn’t Bryce himself; it’s what Scott Fitterer gave up to get him and how the front office completely mismanaged the assets that followed. The picks from the Christian McCaffrey trade — one of our few major opportunities to rebuild with young talent — were essentially wasted. The second-rounder was used on Jonathan Mingo,  The third and fourth-round picks were packaged to move up for DJ Johnson, a 25-year-old rookie  who looked like a miss from day 1.  That’s brutal roster management. And when you add in other misses like Trevon Wallace and Xavier Legette—guys who were supposed to be athletic difference-makers but haven’t moved the needle—it just compounds the issue. Combine that with a string of awful free-agent signings (Hurst, Chark, Bozeman regressing, etc.), and it’s no wonder the offense looks like a mess. And this goes beyond Fitterer — it’s a scouting department problem too. For years, the Panthers’ evaluations have been inconsistent and reactive. They’ve chased traits and combine numbers over production and football IQ. The same front office that identified DJ Johnson as a third-round target somehow passed on multiple plug-and-play starters at positions of need. When your scouting process keeps missing on mid-round talent — the backbone of good teams — no quarterback can save you. The lack of depth and development across this roster is the real indictment. None of these failures are Bryce’s fault directly. But when the entire team looks lifeless, the narrative circles back to him. He was supposed to be the “force multiplier,” the “point guard” who elevates everyone else. Problem is, there’s not much “force” around him to multiply, and that style of quarterback play only works when the infrastructure is solid — coaching, protection, and playmakers. Look at the 49ers for comparison. If San Francisco didn’t have elite coaching, culture, and roster talent, that Trey Lance trade would be seen as one of the biggest front-office blunders ever. The difference is they had the organization to survive it. At least Bryce is serviceable — Lance isn’t even on their roster anymore. Put Bryce in the 49ers’ system and he’s probably putting up Brock Purdy-like numbers. The bottom line is this: the dysfunction in Carolina didn’t start with Bryce Young, and it sure hasn’t ended with him. This is a franchise problem — years of poor drafting, weak scouting, short-sighted trades, and constant turnover. The common denominator through all of it? David Tepper. Until the culture, patience, and football operations at the top change, it won’t matter who the quarterback is.  
×
×
  • Create New...