Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The biggest question for the Panthers.


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Biggest Question for Every NFL Team Heading into 2021 OTAs | Bleacher Report | Latest News, Videos and Highlights
 

Quote

Carolina Panthers: Who is Playing Left Tackle?

The Panthers have started 14 players at left tackle since Jordan Gross retired seven years ago. They'll be looking to find No. 15 this offseason, but none of the current options appear viable as a long-term answer for the club. 

Carolina will be trying to find a starter among a group that includes veteran signing Cam Erving, rookie third-rounder Brady Christensen and incumbent linemen Greg Little, Trent Scott and Dennis Daley.

Sometimes BR gets it right.  I think this is the biggest question.  

Do you think we search in FA an LT or do think we're rolling with the roster as it is?

Edited by SBBlue
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll roll with who we have on the roster and try to find the answer...unless one miraculously becomes available.

Yes. Most likely the answer is on the roster. (It was tough writing that)

They'll play around with it, though, to find the right combination on the left side.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

We'll roll with who we have on the roster and try to find the answer...unless one miraculously becomes available.

Yes. Most likely the answer is on the roster. (It was tough writing that)

They'll play around with it, though, to find the right combination on the left side.

Agree but I couldn't bring myself to say that.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...