Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ryan Ramczyk Contract


shaq
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Verge said:

Moton isn't going to get Ramcyzk money. However, we should have got that extension done right after the draft. Boggles my mind how the Saints can just pay anybody and Hurney/Gettleman let guts like Norman/Norwell walk for being 'too expensive'.

Also add Bradberry.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Verge said:

Moton isn't going to get Ramcyzk money.

He'll get what the market dictates but the market is reset frequently. The floor for a top tackle is already pricey whether he stays on the right or makes a switch.  Panthers fans might want to get this hometown discount vibe out of their heads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

The extension is for the next 5 years and they restructured the 2021 salary hit to lower the amount. The saints always kick things down the road which seems to work for them.

eventually the cap will rise and they will get off Brees' dead money 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Verge said:

Moton isn't going to get Ramcyzk money. However, we should have got that extension done right after the draft. Boggles my mind how the Saints can just pay anybody and Hurney/Gettleman let guts like Norman/Norwell walk for being 'too expensive'.

All while rarely signing any FAs worth a poo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jared Patterson said:

How do we always have more cap, a richer owner and somehow the Saints always re-sign whoever they want and we "can't afford it" I literally don't understand. Can someone please explain??? It drives me crazy.

I don't think a richer owner has anything to do with this, not like NO ever pinched pennies with Brees

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

They don’t sign Teddy for $30M for one year, they sign Winston for $1. They extend their best and young players. They don’t pay $13.5M for half a year Okung rentals and $13M for one year of Roberts, Apple and Okung. They let us sign those bottom feeders for what they pay Ramzcyk and Kamala and Thomas and they get 3rd round comp picks when we sign Teddy.

I’ve said it before NO doesn’t dole out huge bucks on old and ineffective FAs and that’s why they can extend and tell-sign their core guys. We are the opposite, especially with Marty and his bring us your weak armed and injured masses. It’s really not hard.

Actually very, very true.... and it makes no sense why we do stuff like that in Charlotte. I mean Teddy has been a back up his entire career at the most important position and has zero arm strength, the Hornets sign Batum and turn around and sign an arguably worse contract in Gordon Hayward immediately after...Like we never learn our lessons, its sickening. Its sad when super average fans look at our moves and say they are awful right away and it always is true.... Embarrassing honestly. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here we go again bitching about the past. Let's get through the PTSD so we can focus on the future instead of always dwelling on the past. It wasn't great the first time, why keep bringing it up over and over. Unless you just like to bitch and complain or just like to be miserable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To all the analysts who said "Caps in 5", thank you for telling us their departure time.
    • We won't know the answer to this for a long time. Reality is, Caleb has been the consensus #1 in that draft for years. Bryce was a similar situation, but mostly the same. He was not the clear and obvious #1 that Caleb was, but most teams had Bryce at QB1. The Panthers were always going to be terrible Bryce's rookie year.  I don't think DJ Moore's presence would have changed anything about that offense, as our guards, center, and left tackle were getting demolished on nearly every snap. It's clear Caleb's dad was trying to do everything possible to ensure Caleb didn't end up in Chicago with Eberflus. It's hard to imagine that he wouldn't have done the same, but probably more publicly with our situation, considering Carolina is an easier target for the media than Chicago. We can all speculate, but it's impossible to tell who is going to have the better career on May 16, 2025. If either QB doesn't pan out, we have an easy answer. If both flame out, the bears clearly won the trade, but it wouldn't have really mattered anyway. We all know how we win the trade. Candidly, even if one of the other picks we gave up ends up being a hall of fame player, we don't know if the panthers would have taken that player anyway. All you can do is make the best decision you can in the moment with the information you have. I really like Bryce Young, and I'm glad he's a Carolina Panther.  The only way to win in the modern NFL is to have an absolute dude at QB. I personally am happy that our franchise recognizes this, as I remember times when they did not. 
×
×
  • Create New...