Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Moton signed to 4 year, $72M deal


AndrewLaskoski
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:
walder_seth.png&w=160&h=160&scale=crop

Seth WalderESPN Analytics 

From 2018-2020, Taylor Moton ranked 2nd and 11th among tackles in run block win rate and pass block win rate, respectively. Last season, Moton ranked 9th and 16th in RBWR and PBWR, respectively. (ESPN / NFL Next Gen Stats)

Damn!! too much math today---Top 15% in Run  blocking and top 25% in pass blocking.Thinking Think GIF by Rodney Dangerfield

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I have said the same thing.  People forget how effective he was in bursts before last year.  A LT needs the ability to match up against all kinds of pass rushers--power and finesse--that is why they are hard to find-

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It very well could be. We'll have to wait out the details. It very well could be a four year extension on top of the franchise tag which would put him under contract for 5 years.

 

 

I may be wrong but I didn't think this was possible. Thought you could only replace the tag with a long term deal...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I think that’s what it is. You call it a 5 year contract because he has 5 years left with us and it’s really a 4 year extension after this tag year.

A lot of times people, especially agents, like to report it in terms of "new money".  Which is what the 4yr/$72m is most likely.

The average annual amount sounds better that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...