Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Second Team to reach 100% Vax status....


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, travisura said:

But the protocols for unvaccinated players who catch covid are much stricter than for vaccinated players who catch covid.

This is true.

But why?

Vaccinated covid-positive++ players...

...who as you highlight are are subject to protocols much less restrictive than unvaccinated covid-positive++...

...can just as easily spread the virus "to the kid who has cancer down the road"...

...as @Snake says.

Seems like any player who is covid-positive++ should be subject to the exact same protocols regardless of their vaccination status.

 

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The irony is that for ps players it matter much less to the team if they are not vaccinated. Five days out for a close encounter, so what as they are not playing anyway. 

That said, if i was a coach in my sixties there is no way I would accept that extra risk for myself, even if I was vaccinated, for a play that far down the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

This is true.

But why?

Vaccinated covid-positive++ players...

...who as you highlight are are subject to protocols much less restrictive than unvaccinated covid-positive++...

...can just as easily spread the virus "to the kid who has cancer down the road"...

...as @Snake says.

Seems like any player who is covid-positive++ should be subject to the exact same protocols regardless of their vaccination status.

 

Not necessarily.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02187-1

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/01/are-covid-vaccines-becoming-less-effective-.html

Tldr; vaccinated folks can transmit the delta variant should they have a breakthrough case, however they are not only less likely to be hospitalized and/or die but the vaccines are shown to be crucially effective in surviving and containing the spread of the delta variant.

Using circular logic, I can see how an anti-vaxxer can help themselves believe what you proposed. However, anybody with a shred of intelligence can see how stupid that line of thinking is.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Snake said:

Here comes the Tucker Carlson fan club who would rather see people die than just take a shot. I swear I really can't wait till they just stop asking and force you guys to provide protection to everyone. Its a shame it has to come to this.

Screenshot_20210902-162317_Free Adblocker Browser.jpg

Question, why do you keep saying Tucker Carlson Fan Club? I don't watch FOX news and have the same views as some of them you say. Who do I watch you ask? I'll tell you.. Spike Cohen, Michael Tracey, Liberterain Party Mises Caucus, An0Maly, Joe Rogan, Dave Smith... Also, you do realize it is not just people who are a certain political party who are skeptical of the Vaccine right? and before you say it... Yes, I am fully Vaccinated since January. 

Edited by Devil Doc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In truth, the NFL's plans and rules dealing with Covid are basically wishful thinking. Right now, everyone wants to make every effort to keep working that it's all going to be business as usual, full slate of games, fans in attendance, no make-up games.

If you look at the spread going on now, and realize that there are other variants lining up behind Delta and will emerge, then we're going to have to be prepared for a season like last year, even with the vaccinations. 

No one wants it, but conditions are that we're just trying to hold another shut down at bay for as long as we can. Come November, December, it's going to get bad. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's not turn this thread into another idiotic pissing match with anti-vaxxers.

My intent is to highlight the competitive advantages of being fully vaccinated and the fact that two of our divisional rivals are going to have that.. The other "real world" aspects of COVID, vaccines, etc have been hashed out dozens of times in here and then the threads summarily sent to the TB or locked.

Why don't we just focus on the FOOTBALL aspects of the subject, since the rest of those issues have been beaten to death.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...