Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Good Morning.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Darknight said:

I rather for the Cowboys to lose. After watching the Bucs last night, they can be beaten. They have no depth in their secondary after a corner and a safety went out for injury. The Cowboys really marched up and down the field last night with ease sometimes

The Bucs are totally beatable. You just need excellent qb and oline play...the two weakest position groups on our roster.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Idk if people noticed but the cowboys were specifically targeting one-on-one matchups with multiple WRs against the Buccs secondary. They limited the run game due to Zach (OL) was out and with the big run stoppers they have and picked they apart with little screen plays, curls and comeback routes and getting the ball into the hands on playmakers. We should take notes. It was a solid game plan. Cowboys would've won if it wasn't for a few drops and missed kicks. 

Well the drops were by Cee Dee Lamb. I don't know if Mike Evans were injured/hurt but he didn't look good last night either. The interception that Dak through was because of Cee Dee Lamb. They kept targeting number 35 and Cockrell. I hope we did take notes.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Bucs would've won by a comfortable margin without the turnover issues. The Cowboys won the turnover battle 4-1 and still lost. That's hard to pull off. Your odds of losing an NFL game when you're +3 in the turnover margin are probably in the single digits.

If Dallas had a better kicker I would probably be sick right now. And IDK what the fug McCarthy was doing last night trotting the kicker out there for a 60 yard field goal. Me personally, I wouldn't have kicked the field goal at the end of the game. I probably would have went for it on 4th down and went for the TD. The Majority of people didn't think they were going to win that game anyway so what do they have to lose? That was just too much time left on the clock for Brady.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shotgun said:

The Bucs are totally beatable. You just need excellent qb and oline play...the two weakest position groups on our roster.  

How can you say those two areas are weak? They have not even played their first game yet.

ive been hearing all week how this was gonna be a blow out and the game ended up being a lot close and entertaining.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Darknight said:

How can you say those two areas are weak? They have not even played their first game yet.

ive been hearing all week how this was gonna be a blow out and the game ended up being a lot close and entertaining.

The same way I can call rb and dline a strength. would you argue against that too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shotgun said:

The same way I can call rb and dline a strength. would you argue against that too?

Yes, I would. We only have CMC. The depth behind him is either JAGs or unproven rookies. If you are basing that RB/DLine is a strength because of last year that's fine. If you are basing that QB/OLine is weak base on last year's performance then I guess that's ok too, but I'm not going to do that. 


Last year is last year. Just because you have a bad year last year does not mean you are going to have a bad year this year and vice versa. Let them play a few games first. They might surprise you like the Cowboys surprised the Bucs and the rest of America last night.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...