Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Good Morning.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Darknight said:

I rather for the Cowboys to lose. After watching the Bucs last night, they can be beaten. They have no depth in their secondary after a corner and a safety went out for injury. The Cowboys really marched up and down the field last night with ease sometimes

The Bucs are totally beatable. You just need excellent qb and oline play...the two weakest position groups on our roster.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Idk if people noticed but the cowboys were specifically targeting one-on-one matchups with multiple WRs against the Buccs secondary. They limited the run game due to Zach (OL) was out and with the big run stoppers they have and picked they apart with little screen plays, curls and comeback routes and getting the ball into the hands on playmakers. We should take notes. It was a solid game plan. Cowboys would've won if it wasn't for a few drops and missed kicks. 

Well the drops were by Cee Dee Lamb. I don't know if Mike Evans were injured/hurt but he didn't look good last night either. The interception that Dak through was because of Cee Dee Lamb. They kept targeting number 35 and Cockrell. I hope we did take notes.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Bucs would've won by a comfortable margin without the turnover issues. The Cowboys won the turnover battle 4-1 and still lost. That's hard to pull off. Your odds of losing an NFL game when you're +3 in the turnover margin are probably in the single digits.

If Dallas had a better kicker I would probably be sick right now. And IDK what the fug McCarthy was doing last night trotting the kicker out there for a 60 yard field goal. Me personally, I wouldn't have kicked the field goal at the end of the game. I probably would have went for it on 4th down and went for the TD. The Majority of people didn't think they were going to win that game anyway so what do they have to lose? That was just too much time left on the clock for Brady.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shotgun said:

The Bucs are totally beatable. You just need excellent qb and oline play...the two weakest position groups on our roster.  

How can you say those two areas are weak? They have not even played their first game yet.

ive been hearing all week how this was gonna be a blow out and the game ended up being a lot close and entertaining.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Darknight said:

How can you say those two areas are weak? They have not even played their first game yet.

ive been hearing all week how this was gonna be a blow out and the game ended up being a lot close and entertaining.

The same way I can call rb and dline a strength. would you argue against that too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shotgun said:

The same way I can call rb and dline a strength. would you argue against that too?

Yes, I would. We only have CMC. The depth behind him is either JAGs or unproven rookies. If you are basing that RB/DLine is a strength because of last year that's fine. If you are basing that QB/OLine is weak base on last year's performance then I guess that's ok too, but I'm not going to do that. 


Last year is last year. Just because you have a bad year last year does not mean you are going to have a bad year this year and vice versa. Let them play a few games first. They might surprise you like the Cowboys surprised the Bucs and the rest of America last night.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
    • Canes now have 19 losses on the year. Here is the truly alarming stat. 13 of those were multiple goal loses. 9 of those were 3 goal plus losses. This team is getting blown out more than any other year under Rod.     why?  Blue line is a total mess. It’s just no good with their combinations.  It pains me to say this, but they were mikes better with Burns and Orlov. They need Slavin so bad.  Health.  Size. The team is too small and has no physical play. Most forwards do not forecheck.  Worst under Rod.  Goalie play. Pretty average to sub par. PK is downright bad. It’s allowing a little over a goal a game. Worst under Rod.    Team will not win a playoff round under its current group of players. It’s not constructed to do so against heavy teams.      solutions.  Must get physical size by the trade deadline. Rod and Tulsky know this. That probably has to come with the 2C.  KKs size but a better scorer and meaner.  The need another physical winger.  Goalie. Either go all in on a top guy on a bad team or get average. Lastly, better defense. Need a Right shot heavy defenseman.  Yes that could mean someone’s favorite dman could sit. Looking at you Boom.    thats 3-4 new guys that must be brought in for them to have a chance at a cup.  And it’s all players that are different and better than what they have.  They have the cap. KK is gone. Add 4 mill back.    And then hope it’s jells unlike Mikko.  
×
×
  • Create New...