Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Biggest glaring redzone weakness?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Agree. Heck, two good throws and no one is talking about Brady or RZ at all. The fumble doesn’t even happen.

I still agree with the others that the “biggest” issue is that we can’t run up the middle. It’s such a big part of GL offense, especially the play action fake. It also brings in the S/LBers tighter and makes those fades and other passes more likely to be 1 on 1s.

we defintely have a personel issue when it comes to that. Hopefiuly once the coaches make the change and bring in Brown/Christenson to play on the line, this is no longer an issue. But, that doesnt solve for MP

😞

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

IT'S definitely play calling they still try to get too cute.

I was told I was overreacting when I jumped on Rhule's comments not to worry about Red Zone Offense in preseason since it was only vanilla stuff, no trick plays, etc.   But I repeat, it's very VERY concerning if we can only win in the Red Zone with cute trick plays.  Love CMC to death, but running him up the middle near the goal line on 3rd and 1 or 4th and 1 is not often successful.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KB_fan said:

I was told I was overreacting when I jumped on Rhule's comments not to worry about Red Zone Offense in preseason since it was only vanilla stuff, no trick plays, etc.   But I repeat, it's very VERY concerning if we can only win in the Red Zone with cute trick plays.  Love CMC to death, but running him up the middle near the goal line on 3rd and 1 or 4th and 1 is not often successful.

I agree completely, RedZone plays need to be about execution not finesse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, micnificent28 said:

I have no idea what this coaching staff has against thumpers and or goalinebacks but, it has been clear to me over the years CMC is fantastic in space* he can make the wow plays the eye opening catches.. but 4th and you gotta have it and they know it's coming... just isn't the situation you want to put him in.

If you want to throw him a swing or something on 4th. I'm all for it.. but don't just hammer him in there like Tolbert or cam we haven't had a presence like that since those guys left or Stewart for that matter. I'm not sure how we sign guys like arnold as backup tightens and gio the new designated fullback and no rb on the roster pushes 220( Royse freeman is 238)*.  

I'm not saying that hammering it in on 4th and 1 is the only way to go but you damn well better have the threat that you can muscle up and punch it in if need be. This role needs to be addressed in tight ball games or those situations could result in losses down the road.

 

If the OL wouldn't get stalemated every time he'd score.

 

Emmitt Smith didn't have all those TDs because he was fast or powerful. 

He had holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Huh? You need to be both and it’s OK to be good at both. We can’t really run the ball because the D is much tighter and closer to the LOS so our interior OL getting no push means we have to pass or run outside/trick play like QB draw.

We don't have the personnel to be both. That should have been clear.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

He isn't a bruiser by any means but today we kept running him up the middle like he was Stephen Davis. He's a threat in the open field use him as such but good grief we were predictable.

Cmac has busted plenty of 40 plus yard tds right between the tackles. 

The problem is blocking not the back.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So happy that LaMelo got the layup to go and *won* the game. How happy he was after the game, that's what a young dude like him needs to keep it going and keep the belief going. If we lose, LaMelo gets blamed, and he's got an offseason to be in his head and hear the noise like the last few years. The season might still have an ugly ending, but weirdly feels like last night was HUGE for this team moving forward.   
    • My thoughts on Carolina's post-season run: Obviously, the season began with a below average Freddie Andersen and everyone hoping Kochetkov would pick up the slack, until he got hurt. Enter Brandon Bussi who had a made-for-TV movie type run until the end of the season, when he came crashing back to earth, his save % drops under .900 and the team needs to score 5-6 goals to win games. Freddie has shown signs of a resurgence and Bussi looked pretty good the last 2 games of the season, but both sample sizes are small and questions abound for all 3 goalies. The physicality of playoff hockey will take its toll. Save for a few players, the Canes best players are small, their top 2 lines are small and there's no getting around that. The only way to protect the size disadvantage is a strong forecheck. Allowing opposing teams to establish the offensive zone and create board battles with smaller players will hurt Carolina. The Stankoven line could be a difference-maker. If they continue to play well against lower defensive pairs, it only adds to the depth of the team.  The Aho line had stretches of absenteeism during the season. The Canes cannot afford to have them dry up offensively and leave the scoring to Ehlers and the Stankoven line. If they aren't performing well, teams will simply roll their best lines out on the Canes best playing lines.  If the Canes can get by Ottawa and get some help from Boston against Buffalo, I think they have a legit shot to make the finals. Make no mistake, I think their toughest challenges are Ottawa and Buffalo in the East. 
×
×
  • Create New...