Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Biggest glaring redzone weakness?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Agree. Heck, two good throws and no one is talking about Brady or RZ at all. The fumble doesn’t even happen.

I still agree with the others that the “biggest” issue is that we can’t run up the middle. It’s such a big part of GL offense, especially the play action fake. It also brings in the S/LBers tighter and makes those fades and other passes more likely to be 1 on 1s.

we defintely have a personel issue when it comes to that. Hopefiuly once the coaches make the change and bring in Brown/Christenson to play on the line, this is no longer an issue. But, that doesnt solve for MP

😞

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

IT'S definitely play calling they still try to get too cute.

I was told I was overreacting when I jumped on Rhule's comments not to worry about Red Zone Offense in preseason since it was only vanilla stuff, no trick plays, etc.   But I repeat, it's very VERY concerning if we can only win in the Red Zone with cute trick plays.  Love CMC to death, but running him up the middle near the goal line on 3rd and 1 or 4th and 1 is not often successful.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KB_fan said:

I was told I was overreacting when I jumped on Rhule's comments not to worry about Red Zone Offense in preseason since it was only vanilla stuff, no trick plays, etc.   But I repeat, it's very VERY concerning if we can only win in the Red Zone with cute trick plays.  Love CMC to death, but running him up the middle near the goal line on 3rd and 1 or 4th and 1 is not often successful.

I agree completely, RedZone plays need to be about execution not finesse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, micnificent28 said:

I have no idea what this coaching staff has against thumpers and or goalinebacks but, it has been clear to me over the years CMC is fantastic in space* he can make the wow plays the eye opening catches.. but 4th and you gotta have it and they know it's coming... just isn't the situation you want to put him in.

If you want to throw him a swing or something on 4th. I'm all for it.. but don't just hammer him in there like Tolbert or cam we haven't had a presence like that since those guys left or Stewart for that matter. I'm not sure how we sign guys like arnold as backup tightens and gio the new designated fullback and no rb on the roster pushes 220( Royse freeman is 238)*.  

I'm not saying that hammering it in on 4th and 1 is the only way to go but you damn well better have the threat that you can muscle up and punch it in if need be. This role needs to be addressed in tight ball games or those situations could result in losses down the road.

 

If the OL wouldn't get stalemated every time he'd score.

 

Emmitt Smith didn't have all those TDs because he was fast or powerful. 

He had holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Huh? You need to be both and it’s OK to be good at both. We can’t really run the ball because the D is much tighter and closer to the LOS so our interior OL getting no push means we have to pass or run outside/trick play like QB draw.

We don't have the personnel to be both. That should have been clear.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

He isn't a bruiser by any means but today we kept running him up the middle like he was Stephen Davis. He's a threat in the open field use him as such but good grief we were predictable.

Cmac has busted plenty of 40 plus yard tds right between the tackles. 

The problem is blocking not the back.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Person   @josephperson · 16m     Panthers become the 1st team this yr with 5 weekly winners: Rico Dowdle, Ryan Fitzgerald, Sam Martin, Tre'von Moehrig and Bryce. Panthers last did that in 2017: Cam Newton, Julius Peppers, Luke Kuechly, Jonathan Stewart and Damiere Byrd.
    • Gotta wonder if Smitty's brain has turned to mush with how hard he played in the NFL
    • OK, fair enough--however, since my point was that drafting a QB in the top 10 is stupid, if you consider the players who were not drafted in the top 10 or those who WERE drafted in the top 10 and did not secure starting positions with the team that drafted them, you should see the point.  Is it smart to draft a QB in the top 10 when only 4 are still starting for the team that drafted them.  Next, consider that half of that number, 2, were drafted outside the first round.  Next, there are 4 (Goff, Mayfield, Jones, and Darnold) who are starting on other teams after busting.   That number could increase as Arizona seems ready to move on from Murray, Miami is not sold on Tua, and jacksonville is still waiting for Trevor to start looking elite.  Bryce?   So to answer your question, there are MANY more QBs in the NFL who have busted and become starters on other rosters, were drafted after day 1, or are still on the cusp than the four who have become elite.  I thought that point was made. 
×
×
  • Create New...