Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Morning After - Jets at Panthers


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I saw a fumble on what would've likely been a walk in TD and two misfires to open receivers in the end zone. We left 3 TDs on the field. No one would be complaining about scoring 40 and that's what we should've done.

Could’ve, Would’ve, should’ve doesn’t matter we played like crap against probably worst team in league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm just saying you can't put those on your OC.

For sure there were execution issues but you have to let those young players take their lumps so they can build on it and if they can't next man up. Even 22 had issues in his rookie year you'll never know what their potential is if you're scared to give them snaps bc of a mistake especially in the second half of a game you were previously in control of.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

For sure there were execution issues but you have to let those young players take their lumps so they can build on it and if they can't next man up. Even 22 had issues in his rookie year you'll never know what their potential is if you're scared to give them snaps bc of a mistake especially in the second half of a game you were previously in control of.

What rookies? The fumble was on Darnold. The two missed throws were on Darnold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m trying to figure out how Charlton was not in walk of shame, I mean he was so terrible. I mean I know our line would be there every week but I think he should have been at the top. Shanked punts and just couldn’t pin them back. That’s why I was more upset we didn’t go for it on the 33, after his god awful punt. Also add Ian Thomas I mean every catch is a bobble or a drop, can’t believe we didn’t just cut and save 2 mil. Damn

Edited by BurnNChinn
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

What rookies? The fumble was on Darnold. The two missed throws were on Darnold.

I thought we were treating Sam like a rookie? Isn't that what the coaches kept saying? I think he will only get better with more chemistry. He could have played better and we could have put up a ton of points, fortunately we were playing a shitty team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not familiar enough with Brady yet to make that call.

CMC is going to feast.  The concerns of his usage are exaggerated.  Every RB in the league is the check down option on most plays.  Its just more effective when we do it.  CMC also knows how to limit contact.  Hes going to take an average to slightly above average amount of contact at his position.  For a superstar that needs all the touches he can stand, this is great for us.   

Sam Darnold played safe.  He made the 1st steps to trusting his playmakers.  He stood in there and took a couple good pops, unlike in the past tho, his receivers caught those passes giving him the confidence to do it again.  If he can get comfortable knowing his guys are gonna go get it, I think the kid is gonna let loose a fury on some defenses sooner than later.

There will be some frustrating moments this year, but the star is growing brighter around this team.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, L-TownCat said:

Sam Darnold played safe.  

Has/had to...you see our OL grade? 
 Better yet you put the replay on to see how bad it was with the exception of the Ts who played alright. This team always come sin opposites. When we had a good interior we had no Ts now we have Ts who can block and have no interior.

Its only to his betterment that he gets the ball out quick and yet he still took some hits even when releasing it about as fast as you could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fox007 said:

Has/had to...you see our OL grade? 
 Better yet you put the replay on to see how bad it was with the exception of the Ts who played alright. This team always come sin opposites. When we had a good interior we had no Ts now we have Ts who can block and have no interior.

Its only to his betterment that he gets the ball out quick and yet he still took some hits even when releasing it about as fast as you could.

That wasn't supposed to be a slight.  Its what we all wanted him to do. Its what he was asked to do.  He did it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...