Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Morning After - Jets at Panthers

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I saw a fumble on what would've likely been a walk in TD and two misfires to open receivers in the end zone. We left 3 TDs on the field. No one would be complaining about scoring 40 and that's what we should've done.

Could’ve, Would’ve, should’ve doesn’t matter we played like crap against probably worst team in league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm just saying you can't put those on your OC.

For sure there were execution issues but you have to let those young players take their lumps so they can build on it and if they can't next man up. Even 22 had issues in his rookie year you'll never know what their potential is if you're scared to give them snaps bc of a mistake especially in the second half of a game you were previously in control of.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, frankw said:

For sure there were execution issues but you have to let those young players take their lumps so they can build on it and if they can't next man up. Even 22 had issues in his rookie year you'll never know what their potential is if you're scared to give them snaps bc of a mistake especially in the second half of a game you were previously in control of.

What rookies? The fumble was on Darnold. The two missed throws were on Darnold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
Posted (edited)

I’m trying to figure out how Charlton was not in walk of shame, I mean he was so terrible. I mean I know our line would be there every week but I think he should have been at the top. Shanked punts and just couldn’t pin them back. That’s why I was more upset we didn’t go for it on the 33, after his god awful punt. Also add Ian Thomas I mean every catch is a bobble or a drop, can’t believe we didn’t just cut and save 2 mil. Damn

Edited by BurnNChinn
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

What rookies? The fumble was on Darnold. The two missed throws were on Darnold.

I thought we were treating Sam like a rookie? Isn't that what the coaches kept saying? I think he will only get better with more chemistry. He could have played better and we could have put up a ton of points, fortunately we were playing a shitty team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted

I'm not familiar enough with Brady yet to make that call.

CMC is going to feast.  The concerns of his usage are exaggerated.  Every RB in the league is the check down option on most plays.  Its just more effective when we do it.  CMC also knows how to limit contact.  Hes going to take an average to slightly above average amount of contact at his position.  For a superstar that needs all the touches he can stand, this is great for us.   

Sam Darnold played safe.  He made the 1st steps to trusting his playmakers.  He stood in there and took a couple good pops, unlike in the past tho, his receivers caught those passes giving him the confidence to do it again.  If he can get comfortable knowing his guys are gonna go get it, I think the kid is gonna let loose a fury on some defenses sooner than later.

There will be some frustrating moments this year, but the star is growing brighter around this team.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, L-TownCat said:

Sam Darnold played safe.  

Has/had to...you see our OL grade? 
 Better yet you put the replay on to see how bad it was with the exception of the Ts who played alright. This team always come sin opposites. When we had a good interior we had no Ts now we have Ts who can block and have no interior.

Its only to his betterment that he gets the ball out quick and yet he still took some hits even when releasing it about as fast as you could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted
Just now, Fox007 said:

Has/had to...you see our OL grade? 
 Better yet you put the replay on to see how bad it was with the exception of the Ts who played alright. This team always come sin opposites. When we had a good interior we had no Ts now we have Ts who can block and have no interior.

Its only to his betterment that he gets the ball out quick and yet he still took some hits even when releasing it about as fast as you could.

That wasn't supposed to be a slight.  Its what we all wanted him to do. Its what he was asked to do.  He did it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...