Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did Tepper ixnay #keeppounding chant?


RenoCarolina
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Zod said:

Everything I have heard points to Tepper wanting to squeeze every penny out of everything at the stadium. Taking up the big screens for a chant instead of showing ads probably was why it was done away with. Now they are doing damage control. 

it’s not much damage control….

it’s like….oh sorry about that.  Since you are crying we will give it to you for one game in order for you to officially say your goodbye to it. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Moo Daeng said:

The reactionary hand wringing over this is one of the more embarrassing things this fan base has done. 

So they did the drummer and this is only about not getting the prompt to do the cheer that used to erupt spontaneously?

 

The Keep Pounding chant never erupted spontaneously. It has always been prompted by scoreboard graphics or Sir Purr. Getting 72,000 people, some noticeably drunk, to chant in unison without a prompt is near impossible.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Zod said:

Obviously some of you have never been to games and it shows. 

 

It is an orchestrated chant where one half of the stadium does Keep and the other half does Pounding. Its not something that can happen just by fan initiative. 

You ain’t been in the upper deck in awhile and it shows 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

The ‘hype guy’  at the stadium is absolutely the lamest and most annoying thing I have ever seen at a sporting event, any sporting event  

 

 

It is really weird. What happens when that guy's brother doesn't play here anymore? He move on to the next team? 

Roaring Riot is a grass roots fan base thing and Tepper decides to give that guy all the publicity out of no where. It is really strange. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Zod said:

Roaring Riot is a grass roots fan base thing and Tepper decides to give that guy all the publicity out of no where. It is really strange. 

Tepper hires expert/seasoned football operations people to make those decisions, he's not involved.  

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Cookie Lyon said:

I've seen numerous complaints online about other issues that occurred on gameday as well.

What were they?

I was on an airplane at game time so wasn't able to watch but did hear there were lots of empty seats -- is this accurate?

If attendance was way down what's the suspected reason/s why?

Chiefs-Browns was standing room only...

UGa vs. Clemson at Panthers Stadium was also SRO.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...