Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Carr loving the Panthers and Matt Rhule

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Bartin Collaborator

Bartin

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, RenoCarolina said:

Yet another “college defense” comment. 

Not sure why it upsets everyone so much that people say this. Did people get mad if the media said that we ran a "college" offense with Cam? Even Rhule just a few minutes ago in his press conference said the defense has been basically the same since Temple through Baylor and now with the Panthers. They tailor some things to personnel but it's all the same concepts and terminology.

As long as it works I couldn't care less.

Edited by Bartin
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Not sure why it upsets everyone so much that people say this. Did people get mad if the media said that we ran a "college" offense with Cam? Even Rhule just a few minutes ago in his press conference said the defense has been basically the same since Temple through Baylor and now with the Panthers. They tailor some things to personnel but it's all the same concepts and terminology.

As long as it works I couldn't care less.

Its ignorance...lots of college offenses now...how you fuging suppose college defense wasn't going to come through too

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bartin Collaborator

Bartin

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Its ignorance...lots of college offenses now...how you fuging suppose college defense wasn't going to come through too

It's factual and yes they were bound to come through eventually but I'm fairly sure we are really one of the first that has taken a college style defense to the NFL so it is unique in the NFL and to former players and analysts that's the easiest way for them to describe it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Bartin said:

It's factual and yes they were bound to come through eventually but I'm fairly sure we are really one of the first that has taken a college style defense to the NFL so it is unique in the NFL and to former players and analysts that's the easiest way for them to describe it.

Na I'm saying its ignorance to get upset at it. Our fanbase is known for not understanding some basic poo like that. They got a lot of players that already know/fit the scheme too and it helps get off to such a fast start.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bartin Collaborator

Bartin

Posted
Posted
Just now, Fox007 said:

Na I'm saying its ignorance to get upset at it. Our fanbase is known for not understanding some basic poo like that. They got a lot of players that already know/fit the scheme too and it helps get off to such a fast start.

Ah ok I gotcha and yes I agree that it likely makes the transition super easy for the young guys which is great while rebuilding it through the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Ah ok I gotcha and yes I agree that it likely makes the transition super easy for the young guys which is great while rebuilding it through the draft.

Well yea like Reddick was under Rhule for example and so is the DT who batted down Winstons pass. They are playing good in the scheme but yea Reddick looks good regardless when he plays in the manner in which AZ used him and obv Rhule knows how to use him.

Reddick was a 13th pick and could be one of the biggest FA steals at all. If he continues his 10+ sack trajectory like it appears he clearly can in this defense then acquiring that without actually having to use a 1st round pick can't be overstated how good that is.

Edited by Fox007
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Bartin said:

Not sure why it upsets everyone so much that people say this. Did people get mad if the media said that we ran a "college" offense with Cam? Even Rhule just a few minutes ago in his press conference said the defense has been basically the same since Temple through Baylor and now with the Panthers. They tailor some things to personnel but it's all the same concepts and terminology.

As long as it works I couldn't care less.

Calling it a "college defense" is a downright f*cking stupid comment. The Panthers are an NFL team so it's literally a professional defense that's currently ranked #1 in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, hepcat said:

Calling it a "college defense" is a downright f*cking stupid comment. The Panthers are an NFL team so it's literally a professional defense that's currently ranked #1 in the NFL.

I get where they're coming from, in the sense that Snow is using College concepts to scheme up a 'free hitter' on the play.

College defence is much worse than Pro defence tho as they don't have as much time to practice or study tape - so it's a petty comment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Hubbard says he might have rushed back

      By strato · Posted

      I agree it is more about the OL. If you happen to have a world beater with a great OL then that’s better obviously but you don’t need to have that.  Capable and durable guys that can get to the second level with good blocking can be plenty.  
    • Bear Hands
      Hubbard says he might have rushed back

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      I think Gibbs is special, but you’re right, some of the top investments have proven to not be much different than some 2nds and 3rds. Taylor for example is on an MVP level season. James Cook is doing better than Breece Hall for example. Raiders weren’t in a good spot to draft Jeanty. Same with the Falcons/Bijan.  You gotta swing at the right time — the investment shouldn’t come too early. You almost have to stumble into a guy mid to late rounds while building or find that guy to put you over the top when the team is finally well rounded.
    • SmokinwithWilly
      ESPN’s Benjamin Solak on Panthers LT

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      Like I said in another post yesterday, the handling of the offensive line by Fitterer and mostly Morgan has been crazy. We've spent way too much money(Lewis and Hunt) to keep Bryce upright instead of using our picks in the 2nd round on JPJ and Frazier. Could have kept an injured Corbett at guard, Brady at swing, and still taken Maye as a backup, sorry Zavala. We wouldn't have taken XL, but XL hasn't been as advertised anyway, and Brooks hasn't contributed anything. Moton's extension with it's signing bonus made him uncutable. Icky's contract was due at the same time Bryce's 3rd year ended, and we all know it's extension or 5th year, and if we're going to do a 5th year, he's going to want the extension.  To me the whole thing is just ridiculous. Right now, depending on if Tepper decides to keep Bryce, it feels like we're going to have to choose between Icky and a Bryce extension. Maybe he plays on the 5th year, but I think he'll want the big money guarantee.  JMO, but if you took a look at how the contracts could potentially fall, the writing was on the wall that this could be a cash flow nightmare. Too many contract guarantees, not enough rookie contracts to offset the upcoming paydays. 
×
×
  • Create New...