Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lol ESPN Hates US


Catsfan69
 Share

Recommended Posts

So I've been watching the morning shows and instead of breaking down our game last night  ad nauseam like they normally would. We get some blurbs about Cmac a couple of blurbs about Darnold.

The Rest of the Morning has been Brady vs Stafford and a must win for the Steelers. 

They will never ever get over us.

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

They literally salivated over us all day yesterday...what more do you want?

Yea they literally didn't say poo about the Texans lol. Usually that is us not getting talked about in the matchup...The Panthers haven't done a god damn thing but lose when they made it to the SB so wtf would anyone care.

Brady is the best football player of all time so no fugin poo a 100 year old QB still winning SBs is going to take up all the time as it should fugin be. How about we first get back to back winning seasons...hmmm....can we do that as a start.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

They literally salivated over us all day yesterday...what more do you want?

An honest breakdown of the game like they seem to do for everyone else.

I'm not talking as much about Sportscenter but Get Up tends to get more into it.

Did you see how much next day stuff there was Tuesday?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, travisura said:

I mean, from a neutral perspective there wasn't really anything that noteworthy coming out of the game, other than CMC's injury, and Davis Mill's debut. Other than that, it's just stuff that Panthers or Texans fans care about.

Darnold was impressive facing adversity with a bad line and no Cmac 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Everyone talks about how important it is to draft a QB in round 1 and have the "5th year option" I haven't seen it play out the well over the past several years. The good/great QB' aren't playing the first 5 years under their original deal.  After year 3 or 4 they are getting mammoth extensions. Having Penix take over in year 3 may actually save the Falcons some money over the next 5 seasons. I doubt they'd give him an extension after his first year as a starter if he took over the starting position after the guaranteed portion of Kurt Cousins new deal ends in 2025.   In terms of playing time, Penix 3 years as a starter would be ending with the 5th year of his rookie deal (assuming his option was picked up). The money Penix would be making in year 5 of a rookie contract would be significantly less than the upper echelon 5 year starters are making now.  
    • I mean you can see it in his highlights - he has CBs from Yale and Colgate in his hip pocket.  Yes he's making contested catches and moving the chains, but those aren't even P4 CBs and he's struggling to separate. 
    • Working for a season under Adam Thielen (another undrafted WR) should be a positive factor.  Some of these issues are correctable.  Many kids from small schools not only lack experience against DI schools, they lack the coaching that develops talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...