Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hamstring injury information


Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D.
 Share

Recommended Posts

I found a fantastic post on Reddit about hamstring injuries and average number of games missed.

 

Strength-Speed 774 points 3 hours ago*

They did a study on 38 NFL hamstring strains

Players missed 2.6 ± 3.1 games. Based on MRI, the hamstring injury involved the biceps femoris long head in 34 cases and the proximal and distal hamstrings in 25 and 22 cases, respectively. When < 50% of the muscle was involved, the average number of games missed was 1.8; if > 75%, then 3.2. Ten players had retraction, missing 5.5 games. By MRI, grade I injuries yielded an average of 1.1 missed games; grade II, 1.7; and grade III, 6.4. Players who missed 0 or 1 game had an MRI score of 8.2; 2 or 3 games, 11.1; and 4 or more games, 13.9.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445213/

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Games are thought of as discrete data.  You play in a game or you don't.  Yes / No.  

Here the study is talking about averages.  In statistical terms, averages are continuous.  You can have an average of 2.6 games.  Or 2.3333.  Or 2.19293.  A continuous measure can include any fraction because you're looking at an overall summary of a whole bunch of games.  

 

The most important conclusion of the study is the average of 2.6 games missed for hamstring injuries.  So the best guess is that CMC will miss the next 2 or 3 games.    

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. said:

I found a fantastic post on Reddit about hamstring injuries and average number of games missed.

 

Strength-Speed 774 points 3 hours ago*

They did a study on 38 NFL hamstring strains

Players missed 2.6 ± 3.1 games. Based on MRI, the hamstring injury involved the biceps femoris long head in 34 cases and the proximal and distal hamstrings in 25 and 22 cases, respectively. When < 50% of the muscle was involved, the average number of games missed was 1.8; if > 75%, then 3.2. Ten players had retraction, missing 5.5 games. By MRI, grade I injuries yielded an average of 1.1 missed games; grade II, 1.7; and grade III, 6.4. Players who missed 0 or 1 game had an MRI score of 8.2; 2 or 3 games, 11.1; and 4 or more games, 13.9.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445213/

I can’t trust this until I know what your doctorate is in 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, BlitzMonster said:

Games are thought of as discrete data.  You play in a game or you don't.  Yes / No.  

Here the study is talking about averages.  In statistical terms, averages are continuous.  You can have an average of 2.6 games.  Or 2.3333.  Or 2.19293.  A continuous measure can include any fraction because you're looking at an overall summary of a whole bunch of games.  

 

The most important conclusion of the study is the average of 2.6 games missed for hamstring injuries.  So the best guess is that CMC will miss the next 2 or 3 games.    

I'm going to guess 3 to err on the side of caution

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Rodriguez is my pick. Dude came in college as a QB. Understands the mindset and one of our biggest issues last year was the middle of the field and coverage. Some worried about his size. You can put on mass but the mechanics is where its at. With DB require attention on the line, he will be able to get through for the run but his coverage skills is off the chart. Ive been saying this for weeks. He would be my pick. He wasnt a heisman runner up for nothing.
    • It's wild that for most of the season, Stank and Freddie were seen as our 2 biggest impediments to a Stanley Cup. And, through the 1st two games, they would be our postseason MVPs!
    • Pickett has a better deep ball than Bryce unfortunately, but similar touch on what Bryce would usually throw, and he can QB sneak. He won't get the same reps or favorability but I'd love for him or Grier to do well in preseason games to make Bryce look like a liability just to shake up the front office. 
×
×
  • Create New...