Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hamstring injury information


Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D.
 Share

Recommended Posts

I found a fantastic post on Reddit about hamstring injuries and average number of games missed.

 

Strength-Speed 774 points 3 hours ago*

They did a study on 38 NFL hamstring strains

Players missed 2.6 ± 3.1 games. Based on MRI, the hamstring injury involved the biceps femoris long head in 34 cases and the proximal and distal hamstrings in 25 and 22 cases, respectively. When < 50% of the muscle was involved, the average number of games missed was 1.8; if > 75%, then 3.2. Ten players had retraction, missing 5.5 games. By MRI, grade I injuries yielded an average of 1.1 missed games; grade II, 1.7; and grade III, 6.4. Players who missed 0 or 1 game had an MRI score of 8.2; 2 or 3 games, 11.1; and 4 or more games, 13.9.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445213/

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Games are thought of as discrete data.  You play in a game or you don't.  Yes / No.  

Here the study is talking about averages.  In statistical terms, averages are continuous.  You can have an average of 2.6 games.  Or 2.3333.  Or 2.19293.  A continuous measure can include any fraction because you're looking at an overall summary of a whole bunch of games.  

 

The most important conclusion of the study is the average of 2.6 games missed for hamstring injuries.  So the best guess is that CMC will miss the next 2 or 3 games.    

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. said:

I found a fantastic post on Reddit about hamstring injuries and average number of games missed.

 

Strength-Speed 774 points 3 hours ago*

They did a study on 38 NFL hamstring strains

Players missed 2.6 ± 3.1 games. Based on MRI, the hamstring injury involved the biceps femoris long head in 34 cases and the proximal and distal hamstrings in 25 and 22 cases, respectively. When < 50% of the muscle was involved, the average number of games missed was 1.8; if > 75%, then 3.2. Ten players had retraction, missing 5.5 games. By MRI, grade I injuries yielded an average of 1.1 missed games; grade II, 1.7; and grade III, 6.4. Players who missed 0 or 1 game had an MRI score of 8.2; 2 or 3 games, 11.1; and 4 or more games, 13.9.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445213/

I can’t trust this until I know what your doctorate is in 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, BlitzMonster said:

Games are thought of as discrete data.  You play in a game or you don't.  Yes / No.  

Here the study is talking about averages.  In statistical terms, averages are continuous.  You can have an average of 2.6 games.  Or 2.3333.  Or 2.19293.  A continuous measure can include any fraction because you're looking at an overall summary of a whole bunch of games.  

 

The most important conclusion of the study is the average of 2.6 games missed for hamstring injuries.  So the best guess is that CMC will miss the next 2 or 3 games.    

I'm going to guess 3 to err on the side of caution

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ultimately it's up to the other safety prospects to clearly outplay Scott. I think when that happens on tape against other teams it'll be addressed. I think none of them have done that definitively and consistently yet. 
    • Night and day difference in the front office investements.  Since Morgan has been in the FO (5 years)....4 out of 5 first round picks have been offensive players.  The one defensive pick was a corner. Expand it out to the first 2 rounds? 7 out of the 9 picks have been offensive.  That IMO is why our D sucks so bad.   You build defenses up front.   Carolina hasn't been investing there.  Ron's first 5 years? 3 of the 5 first round picks were defensive players.  Expand it all to include second rounders  7 of the 10 picks were defensive.  All front 7 players.     
    • I think he gets this year to show what he can do.  Last year, we had a lot of injuries. This year, we should have some players, even if we lose one or two.  It's the first preseason game.  Some of the starters weren't even in it.  There is no scheming or game planning.  Let's see how guys do when it counts. I think we have a GM that knows a thing or two about defense.  Let it play out.
×
×
  • Create New...