Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3 weeks in...let's look at QBs


davos
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Lance is a long way away from being a NFL starter.  I doubt that is what Rhule and co were looking for. 

My point being, NO rookie was an option as the team was obviously vested in trading for a veteran.  Not Lance, not Fields and honestly probably not Wilson even had he dropped.  Lawrence may have been the only palatable rookie and he was completely out of reach.   It seems the team was unwilling to waste an entire season for a rookie to take their NFL lumps with OJT.  Yes, 9 times out of 10 you essentially flush your season down the toilet when starting a rookie QB.   Rhule obviously had zero interest in doing that.  It was the correct strategy in hindsight, no question.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

He’s also played 3 teams that are 0-9 with a D giving up less than 9 points a game. He’s probably the QB who’s had less pressure than Sam. Our opponents are 3-6 at least. That means our opponents are .500 against other teams not 0-6.

Neither Teddy or Sam have really been tested so we might not want to speak prematurely.

Truth be told, you're right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Kuhndog94 said:

It seemed on par with the Joe Burrow talk in 2020. 

Burrow came out of nowhere.  Lawrence has been hyped up at a national level since his senior year of HS.  NFL execs have been gushing about him forever. It surprises me how "small" he looks (for lack of better term) when I thought he would be more on a Murray, Luck, Cam, etc. type level even going into a bad team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, trueblade said:

I know everyone wants an instant analysis but drawing any conclusions about these QBs in Week 3 is premature.

Which is what I prefaced a few times in the OP.  I know it's early but there are certain things that you can see with guys.  Certain things were clear the second guys like Kizer, Locker, Gabbert, Clausen etc. got on the field in their careers vs. the Cams, Lucks of the world.  Most QBs bust.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

We also decided he didn't fit our offense. That's why we skipped his second workout.

Ah, I wonder why that's why we were so intent on checking him out his first workout.  I mean, we swarmed that 1st pro day of his.  Sent the farm to see if he was a fit, determined he wasn't.  That makes sense ^^^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, davos said:

And it's not what you think.  Definitely not looking at the 2022 NFL Draft prospects. Yuck do they look bad.

Actually, even looking at 2021, they all look pretty bad.  And yes, it is early.  VERY EARLY.  But as many players and coaches say, there are certain intangibles guys either have or don't and they know the SECOND they step onto the practice field after they're drafted.  And the second they're in their first game.

Where to begin?:

Mac Jones: Even with a really solid Patriots team around him, he looks like he's barely scraping by. Doesn't pass the eye test for me.  2 tds, 3 ints in 3 weeks, a 52 qbr,  

Justin Fields Debut: 6-20, 30%, 68 passing yards.  Did not look ready.  Nagy is gone, I don't know if he'll survive a year with that offense.  

Trevor Lawrence: Mr Can't Miss everyone cried about missing out on? He's had some of the worst looking interceptions I've ever seen from a field awareness standpoint.  That flea flicker today is near the top.  What is going on there? 7 ints through 3 games.

Zach Wilson: Lawrence does not own that stat, he shares it.  7 ints through 3 games. 2 passing TDs (1 gimme against us when we put on the brakes)

Trey Lance: Looked decent in preseason, is with a good org and coaches.  They seem to be bringing him along in an interesting way.  He was out of range for us.  But DO NOT FORGET -- he was the who we sent our entire staff to go check out.

Davis Mills? Meh whatever haha

So, I mean, I'm not really craving any of these guys over GEQBUS. This is a man.  

Sammy D ladies and gentlemen:

960x0.jpg%3Ffit=scale

 

 

 

Certainly helps when your QB had already gone through 3 years of Growing Pains (Of Hell) in NY before coming here.   These other QBs are just beginning their journey and I'm sure many a coach will be gone by Year 3.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

People here told me we should trade three 1sts for Zach Wilson... no. I will not stop repeating this over and over for the rest of the season. The reactionary meltdown children that throw a fit when they don’t get what they want should be embarrassed. Cause I’m damn tired of hearing that poo every season.

Me too. I’m sick of the negative loser fans that don’t deserve to root for this team tbh can you imagine there’s people out there saying why did we trade Dan Arnold 😳 pathetic minds I’m annoyed even sharing the same team with them they should go bandwagon the chargers or rams .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, davos said:

Burrow came out of nowhere.  Lawrence has been hyped up at a national level since his senior year of HS.  NFL execs have been gushing about him forever. It surprises me how "small" he looks (for lack of better term) when I thought he would be more on a Murray, Luck, Cam, etc. type level even going into a bad team.

I always felt Trevor's rookie season would be very similar to Peyton Mannings. 

and I think he will end up with the rookie passing TD record in the end.  In that same breath, I always said I think people might be shocked at how many INTs he throws as a rookie.   Like Peyton.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, glenwo2 said:

Certainly helps when your QB had already gone through 3 years of Growing Pains (Of Hell) in NY before coming here.   These other QBs are just beginning their journey and I'm sure many a coach will be gone by Year 3.

3d chess. Of the QBs taken in the draft only 1 has landed with a team that will possibly develop him. I'll let you decide which one. The rest are fuged in that regard. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TAMU had such a weird draft. Usually you'd be bragging your ass off about three DL drafted in the top two rounds except that the narrative around all three was about how badly they were misused by TAMU. LOL
    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that want a little more: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
×
×
  • Create New...