Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Revisiting an OL question

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Maybe you should stop assuming anything about anyone because so far you are wrong on both counts?

Lol defensive much? Cool, keep on cheerleading if you want. Oline doesn't look to be his strength, small sample size here but also concerning outside of the draft which will be another huge step in evaluating his work.

Enjoy his tit, I'm just hoping he can get a lot better in that aspect and not impressed with his work in that area at all yet.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Lol defensive much? Cool, keep on cheerleading if you want. Oline doesn't look to be his strength, small sample size here but also concerning outside of the draft which will be another huge step in evaluating his work.

Enjoy his tit, I'm just hoping he can get a lot better in that aspect and not impressed with his work in that area at all yet.

Well two trades for defense within a week while the oline is in shambles does sound like what went on in Seattle a little bit if we are being fair here.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

Hey, @Mr. ScotYou started this thread. Why don't you  give us your thoughts? 

At some point...

I've said many times though that my preference for starting a discussion is to ask a question and let people give their thoughts.

(as opposed to "Here's my opinion and you know I'm right so everybody deal with it!") 😕

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

At some point...

I've said many times though that my preference for starting a discussion is to ask a question and let people give their thoughts.

(as opposed to "Here's my opinion and you know I'm right so everybody deal with it!") 😕

 

Yeah, it's page 5. Plenty of reactions to talk about. Yet, here you are. Quite as a Church mouse. What happens if the thread dies. We never get the ol Scotty input we all wait for.

 

You can start a thread, give your opinion. Then let the debate start. It happens all the time. Well, for everybody but you.

 

You  have to know this is what you do. You start a thread, then disappear. I mean, you do you dude.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Yeah, it's page 5. Plenty of reactions to talk about. Yet, here you are. Quite as a Church mouse. What happens if the thread dies. We never get the ol Scotty input we all wait for.

You can start a thread, give your opinion. Then let the debate start. It happens all the time. Well, for everybody but you.

You  have to know this is what you do. You start a thread, then disappear. I mean, you do you dude.

I don't care about being the center of attention.

I like good discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jtm Proficient

jtm

Posted
Posted

I've never understood why you'd put Moton at LT when he is elite at RT.  At best, Moton will probably be an average to below average LT because this isn't his natural position.  Let him continue being a stud RT.  

I'd try Christensen at LT b/c he certainly can't be any worse than what we've seen.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBBlue Veteran

SBBlue

Posted
Posted

I don't have enough info to determine if BC belongs at LT over Erving or Moton, or if BC belongs at guard or RT.  I thought when we drafted him that he was going to be our LT. 

The line is performing worse the last 2 games.   I'm sure when Brown and BC finally do get out there, huddlers will be bitching about them.  Huddlers love to  hate on Panthers linemen. 

I just want to at least get back to the OL performance we saw in the Jets or Saints games.  These last two have been bad.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Shotgun
      fug the HATERS

      By Shotgun · Posted

      Going from the 32nd to 27th ranked QB is a huge achievement indeed.
    • TLGPanthersFan
      Bryce Young is the first Panthers QB to throw for 20+ touchdowns in a season since Cam Newton in 2018.

      By TLGPanthersFan · Posted

      I do expect the offense to fall back to earth next year if everything stays the same.  It is kinda like how the Panthers and even now the Chiefs won in the past.  Winning many close, coin flip games.  It never lasts from season to season usually. 
    • hepcat
      I'm sold on the NFL being fixed.

      By hepcat · Posted

      Biased is one way of putting it. The NFL is an entertainment product in the strictest legal sense. Although I might yell it out on game days, I do not believe the games are outright “rigged” meaning there is one team that is going to win no matter what happens. It’s impossible. There’s too much variance in the game that can prevent a truly rigged game from happening unless there was cooperation from many parties involved. What I am thoroughly convinced happens is that the NFL and referees “manage” the games towards certain outcomes. And that is done primarily through referee crew choice however I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s more going on behind the curtain.  The NFL uses the officials statistical tendencies to call penalties is to keep games close to drive user engagement. For example, If a crew tends to call more false start penalties, and there’s a game between a heavy pass offense where the NFL would like to manufacture a close game where it might have potential to be a blowout, then they’ll assign a crew that will slow that offense down and keep the game close.  There is an insane amount of marketing and now sports betting money that is married to the NFL economic ecosystem. To think this whole system is fair when the referee union has no outward accountability structure for poor performance is just naive. It’s closer to the WWE than outward appearances suggest, but it’s not a fully scripted outcome either. So for those who say “stop watching” if you don’t want to watch a “rigged” game, it’s an entertainment product. You can still be entertained by it, even if it’s not as fair as a truly merit based sporting event. 
×
×
  • Create New...