Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Brady with lazy play calling


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

So I had it backwards.  Excuse me. 

He still is not good at his job.  It's easy to blame everyone else for his ineptitude so I would not hang my hat that.  

I know this,  I  will not lose any sleep if he gets another gig somewhere else. 

....you watch some of these other teams constantly attacking with high energy and creative aggressive play calling.... us, run up the middle behind a shttty line that we know is shitty...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pimpdaddy said:

....you watch some of these other teams constantly attacking with high energy and creative aggressive play calling.... us, run up the middle behind a shttty line that we know is shitty...

...that Saints offense he's trying to imitate is not going so well for him.  He better start earning his hype status or he can gtfo.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

So I had it backwards.  Excuse me. 

He still is not good at his job.  It's easy to blame everyone else for his ineptitude so I would not hang my hat that.  

I know this,  I  will not lose any sleep if he gets another gig somewhere else. 

All those career years last season say otherwise. Honestly, I think Bridgewater - while physically limited - might just be a better QB than Darnold.

If we fired Brady while only giving him Darnold and Bridgewater with a shoddy OL to work with in two years, I don't think we'd have good candidates exactly beating down our door seeking out his vacated position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Lynnnie said:

Panthers traded their mojo…Darnold to Arnold. I’m a huge Panthers fan, a season ticket holder and that trade will hurt us. 

 I don’t even know what to say to this.  
Dan Arnolds trade is possibly the most inconsequential move yet.

A historically bad o-line, poor play calling, injuries to 3 of our best  players (CMC,Horn, Shaq).  But Dan Arnold is the straw that broke this beast?

Good lord.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

All those career years last season say otherwise. Honestly, I think Bridgewater - while physically limited - might just be a better QB than Darnold.

If we fired Brady while only giving him Darnold and Bridgewater with a shoddy OL to work with in two years, I don't think we'd have good candidates exactly beating down our door seeking out his vacated position.

If he gets hired away then so be it. Then it will be on Rhule to fix the mess. But he may be part of the problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm not impressed with him at all.

He's had a few good ones but its the baffling stuff that outshines any cool/good calls. There is just no justification to keep running up the gut on critical short yardage situations with backup RBs. No justification for it with CMC either really but he keeps doing that poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fox007 said:

He's had a few good ones but its the baffling stuff that outshines any cool/good calls. There is just no justification to keep running up the gut on critical short yardage situations with backup RBs. No justification for it with CMC either really but he keeps doing that poo.

I agree.  The play calls are getting predictable and the routes are ass 90% of the time. Yesterday was the worst I've seen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think another aspect that people need to think about is how the plays are drawn up in terms of progressions. Our O-line is obvious dog poo so Sam needs to get the ball out quickly. And if your first read is an out route where Robby is literally jogging, well, that's not going to end up well with pressure. Now throw in the fact that we were running the same plays, a defense can easy add all this up coupled with film study and start jumping routes. 

It just feels like there's more than simply "Darnold sucks" and "O-line sucks". I think it's the sum of the parts that are all out of sync. Well, that's what they pay the coaches to fix. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

My take on Brady hasn't changed much.

He's pretty good in the area of play design.

Playcalling and game management? Eeehhh 😕

Right I mean I'm getting there with Rhule. He seems to be able to coach ability but may be worse than even Rivera in the 'in game' management.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, hepcat said:

Brady was so overhyped because of that LSU team. He wasn’t even the offensive coordinator or called any plays there. 

As an LSU and Panthers fan, I think this cannot be said enough.  Ensminger was the OC in 2019 and Brady was there to "dial up" certain plays to attack weaknesses he saw during film and the game.  He never had to actually dictate an entire game and his lack of adjustments reflects this.

Look at what is occurring at LSU right now, they hired Jake Peetz thinking he'd replicate the "Brady Offense" and he seems to have some of the same issues as Brady- Stale ass playcalling and trying to run behind a putrid OL.  Hell, even the C's look like each other, they both get pushed back 5 yards every play into the QB.

Maybe the Panthers can bring in Shula to actually call the game and Brady can watch and draw up plays in his sandbox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He was a project coming out of college and seeing that he doesn’t care much he won’t make it IMO
    • My very UNPOPULAR opinion:   First, I would want to know the locker room.  Have they turned on Canales?  If not, I would stay with him.  Here is why: Switching coaches every year or two is not the answer to long term success.  We are chasing hope instead of building a program around a young coach.  There were not many applicants for this job and if you think they are suddenly dying to be here now, that MIGHT justify a coaching change Canales has made some tough decisions (like benching Bryce), but his weaknesses (the team's weaknesses) have been in the areas in which we have neglected or sucked for years.  Who did we get for CMC?  Who made the trade with the Bears when we had no idea at the time who we wanted?  Who drafted Mingo, Marshall, XL, etc.?  Who signed a frequently-injured CB to the biggest contract in NFL history at the time for a CB?  I look at the personnel decisions and the play calling.  Our edge players are injured and not that good when healthy. He played Johnson because he had nothing left.  Johnson was terrible Sunday.  He has nothing at LB and two starting OL are now out.  XL is pouting because he does not seem to have paid the price to be paid the price of a first round pick.  AT was sent packing.  Bryce's resurgence last year may have been Canales and not Bryce. Evero still does not have the tools he needs to succeed--on the field or perhaps between his ears.   If Canales fires Evero, he is probably doing the right thing.  Remember, we had a lot of money in dead cap when Canales took over.  Fitterer was the worst GM since Matt Millen in the NFL, and we have sucked recently in the first round of the draft (Bryce, XL) until this season.   When the GM is trying to give the coach what he needs to be successful and you keep changing coaches, it is difficult.   I think this--stay with Canales, but bring in a veteran DC.  Some argue that Canales needs to move on from Bryce, but this team is not set up to give him options.  Andy aint the answer.  We never seem to take the PS QB seriously--all eggs are in one basket.  Canales needs options. This team needs to address the QB situation.  Bryce's best games are not Lombardi worthy, so move on.  He is not the Alpha a young coach needs on the field.  Give him options at QB, some LBs and a good coordinator on defense, and I think we could use another stud WR.  It is time to start drafting developmental OL and start grooming them to replace our aging OL. This draft is solid at QB as it stands now.  We need to focus on drafting the right guy and signing a veteran backup who is not the starting QB's BFF.  Compete.  Heck, i have no problem doing what Cleveland did--draft a QB in round 1 and then another QB if one falls into day 3.   I think we need stability and I am not confident any respectable coach comes to Carolina.  Canales is frustrated, but the front office has failed him, as have injuries, and a really bad draft a few years ago that brought them Bryce.  He was hired to fix Bryce--so I say neuter him so he does not sire any more 5'8" QBs.   Canales is better that Rivera was--Canales just has so much less talent.  Rivera was coach of the year a few times because he had Cam Newton, but could never put two winning seasons together.  That is a crime.
×
×
  • Create New...