Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Predictions - Panthers at Giants


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, RJK said:

Giants 13-10. Panthers find a way to lose and the tank is on 

From what I’ve been reading there’s not really anyone for us to tank for. Most of the top QBs this year (including rattler) would be low 1st-high 2nds any other year. Most top OL this year are projected to start going around 12-18.

 

Looks like another infamous 7 win season.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

From what I’ve been reading there’s not really anyone for us to tank for. Most of the top QBs this year (including rattler) would be low 1st-high 2nds any other year. Most top OL this year are projected to start going around 12-18.

 

Looks like another infamous 7 win season.

Wilson and Lance went 2 and 3 after being considered later round picks in the preseason. It seems Rattler is in the doghouse at OU and he probably transfers out and stays in college another year. However, if Howell stays healthy and declares he’s going be the top pick, worse scenario being top 5. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/21/2021 at 11:16 AM, BlackPanther21_ said:

Both teams go run heavy, Chuba goes for 120 yards and 2 TDs.

The Graham Gano we all know and love shows up, Panthers win, 20-17

Gano was not loved as a Panther.

It took him leaving which was celebrated here on the huddle ,  for huddlers to appreciate what we no longer had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, aces said:

35-21 Panthers

Should be an EZ win with Sam throwing for 350 yds & 3 TDs as long as these 2 things happen:

1.  The O-line gives him more than 2 sec to find a receiver 

2. Receivers don't drop 10 balls

 

More #2, though. 

We beat the Vikings without those godawful drops, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, aces said:

35-21 Panthers

Should be an EZ win with Sam throwing for 350 yds & 3 TDs as long as these 2 things happen:

1.  The O-line gives him more than 2 sec to find a receiver 

2. Receivers don't drop 10 balls

 

Not turning the ball over is kinda important too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

From what I’ve been reading there’s not really anyone for us to tank for. Most of the top QBs this year (including rattler) would be low 1st-high 2nds any other year. Most top OL this year are projected to start going around 12-18.

 

Looks like another infamous 7 win season.

This team isn’t winnning 7 games lol

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...