Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Graham Gano: Panthers doctors misdiagnosed career-threatening injury


therealmjl
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, onmyown said:

I know Doctors are human and multiple opinions should be a no brainer when it comes to your health but how do you miss a fracture in the largest bone in your body and somehow relate it to a tendon? Doesn’t a simple x-ray show you the bone? Very odd to me.

Gano most likely had a stress fracture due to the repetitive nature of kicking. His leg didn't snap in half. Almost all bony stress fractures rarely show up on X-rays and in some cases, don't show on MRI's either. But that doesn't excuse the fact that the Panther medical staff did a shitty job in handling the injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Oh no, Kicker revenge game this weekend.

Everyone wear goggles in preparation for the blood and guts. 

I dunno, I would actually have a good laugh if he beats us with a FG to win it, goes to the camera and tells us to keep his lawn cut.  🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure this should come as a surprise.  Anyone with eyes could see something was wrong in 2018.

Do you blame the trainer?  I dunno, a little maybe.  The trainer is really a guy who focuses on recovery.  Getting players ready for the games.  Maybe the trainer should have said something along the lines of "Hey, this isn't improving the way it should".

Do you blame the doctors?  Yea, of course.  It's their job to look at the situation, run whatever tests are necessary and diagnose the issue.  It's not an easy job, but they are paid well . . . even moreso working for an NFL team with million dollar athletes I'm sure.

Do you blame the player?  Yea, probably a little.  When something doesn't feel right, you really owe it to yourself to get a second opinion.  Doctors aren't perfect, and sometimes having a second opinion can open up some avenues of thought that are helpful.  Many players DO get second opinions from outside doctors.  I haven't read anything to indicate Gano did that.

There's blame to go around for the mis-diagnosis for sure.

The real blame should fall on the team for getting rid of him.  Doesn't matter who made that decision, it was clearly the wrong one.  Missed kicks tend to have a much wider impact than is generally accorded them.  They can change a lot of decision making in the game, and these decision can really affect the outcome.  All I know is it sure would be nice to have him on the team right about now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...