Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Old friend Jack Del Rio talking about qb situation this Sunday


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, CanadianCat said:

So the question is how many games could we afford to potentially drop to do that? 

The only guarantee for our season is that if we go undefeated the rest of the way we'll get in.  That's a tall order, yes.  However, if we do manage it, no one will be able to say we don't deserve to be there.

Past that, you're rolling the dice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't see Cam not learning playbook as criticism, just a fact about any QB in a short time. Don't want to be a team or fans that has to find insults in every comment so we can play with a combination of butthurt and chip on the shoulder.  Rather just find confidence in what we can do and roll with it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule said they weren't going full playbook, but rather the game plan.  The thing is, Cam needs to get the timing with the guys down more than anything else.  Cam's thrown all of the routes in his career.  They just have different names.  So long as he and the receivers are close, then WFT has to respect the pass.

I still expect a LOT of running the ball.  The main hope for most of us is competency.  We don't need to throw for 400 yards and 5 TDs.  We do need to string drives together.  We do need to convert downs, and score points.  If we can score 25ish points a game while having good ball control, then that's about all we could ask for.

If we pop off for another 30+ point game, I won't complain!  But I don't think anyone is expecting a miracle.  That reminds me of something I heard:  Who is under more pressure?  Cam or the Coaches?  While I know Cam wants to win, it's really up to the coaches to make it happen via the game plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "I'm not stunned," Hansbrough said. "We talked about it at halftime, you asked me 'you have to be pretty happy.' And I said, 'No I've seen this story before.' I've seen this happen. They just had some lapses in games where they just go still offensively, defensively. Their competitiveness just drops a little bit. They never step on anybody's throat. When they have a team with a little bit of a lead, they never step on the throat. It's been something all year." The only disagreement I'd have with Hansbrough's assessment is that it's not limited to just this year. It's been Hubert's entire tenure. Hallmarks of Hubert's teams are: streaky shooting, streaky focus, running your starters into the dirt because you won't sub, and absolutely embarrassingly bad plays put of timeouts. It all points straight to the coach. When the roster keeps changing but the core fundamental issues keep recurring, it's not the players.
    • Leafs are broken. Out of the playoffs and Matthews done for the year.  It's either a very dangerous game against a team who doesn't give a fug and will leave it all on the ice, or a team who's thrown in the towel with an effort to match. And, yes, I'm sitting in the Miami Airport waiting on my next flight. Will be back in Lenovo both 28 & 29 for the b2b.
    • I’m guessing this counts as top 30 visit.
×
×
  • Create New...