Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Old friend Jack Del Rio talking about qb situation this Sunday


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, CanadianCat said:

So the question is how many games could we afford to potentially drop to do that? 

The only guarantee for our season is that if we go undefeated the rest of the way we'll get in.  That's a tall order, yes.  However, if we do manage it, no one will be able to say we don't deserve to be there.

Past that, you're rolling the dice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't see Cam not learning playbook as criticism, just a fact about any QB in a short time. Don't want to be a team or fans that has to find insults in every comment so we can play with a combination of butthurt and chip on the shoulder.  Rather just find confidence in what we can do and roll with it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule said they weren't going full playbook, but rather the game plan.  The thing is, Cam needs to get the timing with the guys down more than anything else.  Cam's thrown all of the routes in his career.  They just have different names.  So long as he and the receivers are close, then WFT has to respect the pass.

I still expect a LOT of running the ball.  The main hope for most of us is competency.  We don't need to throw for 400 yards and 5 TDs.  We do need to string drives together.  We do need to convert downs, and score points.  If we can score 25ish points a game while having good ball control, then that's about all we could ask for.

If we pop off for another 30+ point game, I won't complain!  But I don't think anyone is expecting a miracle.  That reminds me of something I heard:  Who is under more pressure?  Cam or the Coaches?  While I know Cam wants to win, it's really up to the coaches to make it happen via the game plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...