Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule Has No Idea What He Is Doing


Castavar
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Castavar said:

Ain't he proved it on that wasted timeout on 4th and 4. The fact he didn't already have a plan in place for that situation screams he literally only went for it because the crowd booed him. As a head coach, you should already know whether you are going for it BEFORE it even gets to 4th down. I'm done with this college "cute" coaching staff. They do not have what it takes to succeed in the NFL. Hell, Rhule and Snow couldn't even beat ranked teams in college. This is not surprising.

I endorse Mike Tomlin as the new Carolina panthers head coach! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, WOW!! said:

I don't think it was game plan thoe..

Jackson getting burnt by Mcclarin when he hasn't giving up that many big plays all year.. Can't really be gameplan.. Burns missing sacks and playing the read option wrong all day isn't game plan... Missing Tackles and getting pushed around isn't game plan.. Shaq not being in the right depth on passing plays isn't game plan...

Giving up 18 yards on a 3rd and 21 isn't game plan..

All that is poo is on the players not showing up and playing to the level they have most of the season..

You don’t think putting Jackson on McLaurin was the game plan?  

Jackson wasn’t giving up big plays all year because he has largely hasn’t been covering anyone of note …and largely has played bad QBs.  

McLaurin is one of the best in the game right now.   And you saw the outcome when anyone not named Gilmore covered him.   That’s a horrible game plan and McLaurin’s success got them running, confident and in a offensive groove. 

Washington has too few playmakers for a game plan to be that bad on D. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

You don’t think putting Jackson on McLaurin was the game plan?  

Jackson wasn’t giving up big plays all year because he has largely hasn’t been covering anyone of note …and largely has played bad QBs.  

McLaurin is one of the best in the game right now.   And you saw the outcome when anyone not named Gilmore covered him.   That’s a horrible game plan and McLaurin’s success got them running, confident and in a offensive groove. 

Washington has too few playmakers for a game plan to be that bad on D. 

 

Yea man it was a tee total accident(heard this old white feller say that) that Jackson was on McLaurin...like wtf is that guy talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, ImaginaryKev said:

He signed a long contract, he gone be here a while

 

Everyone keeps saying that. I kept saying if he didn't win this year, it'd be over.

Folks, I think it's nearly over. If we weren't still mathematically capable of sneaking into the playoffs, then it'd happen by our bye week, but we will probably have to drag through the rest of this season and hope that an attractive college gig opens up giving Tepper and Rhule an opportunity to split up and save face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep. If you want to try to run to borders against us, best of luck. We have the speed to feast on that. But if you line up heavy and keep it between the tackles... uh oh.

We don't have the ends or linebackers to defend that...yet.  When they go defense in the draft again this place will lose their collective minds. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

We don't have the ends or linebackers to defend that...yet.  When they go defense in the draft again this place will lose their collective minds. 

I kinda think we do in Gross-Matos and Fox. I think Gross-Matos was out yesterday. In hindsight, that hurt. Against run heavy teams, Gross-Matos needs to be getting a lot of snaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I kinda think we do in Gross-Matos and Fox. I think Gross-Matos was out yesterday. In hindsight, that hurt. Against run heavy teams, Gross-Matos needs to be getting a lot of snaps.

Could also throw some run blitzes up in there while they are running the exact same play. Or we could continue to sit there and run the same defense vs the same play getting the same outcome...can try that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I kinda think we do in Gross-Matos and Fox. I think Gross-Matos was out yesterday. In hindsight, that hurt. Against run heavy teams, Gross-Matos needs to be getting a lot of snaps.

I agree somewhat.  But as you saw they need a breather and Washington took advantage of that when they were on the bench.  We just don't have the depth to compensate.  It's the nature of the beast.  We will always have bad match-ups against some teams like everyone else. We just have to find a way to overcome them. Yesterday was a prime example of not having the manpower to hold our own...yet. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I agree somewhat.  But as you saw they need a breather and Washington took advantage of that when they were on the bench.  We just don't have the depth to compensate.  It's the nature of the beast.  We will always have bad match-ups against some teams like everyone else. We just have to find a way to overcome them. Yesterday was a prime example of not having the manpower to hold our own...yet. 

 

I can't remember if it was you or someone else that brought back up the 3-4. The half assed swap to 3-4 sure didn't help and just helps show that the franchise constantly has someone directing the ship straight into a reef.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I kinda think we do in Gross-Matos and Fox. I think Gross-Matos was out yesterday. In hindsight, that hurt. Against run heavy teams, Gross-Matos needs to be getting a lot of snaps.

Yetur was out there a fair amount. He just wasn't making a splash at all. Fox had his moments, but honestly, they are both built more for DE in a 4-3 defense. This crazy hybrid thing we run, since it was exposed by Dallas, has been exploited by any team that has even a halfway decent o-line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

I can't remember if it was you or someone else that brought back up the 3-4. The half assed swap to 3-4 sure didn't help and just helps show that the franchise constantly has someone directing the ship straight into a reef.

It wasn't me i dont think. I watched the game before I came on here to comment.  But they tried everything to slow the run game down but it didn't matter.  They washed out out tackles and put olinemen in our second level on linebackers.  We were toast from the jump because our fast DE's and linebackers got taken out of the play.  Perfect game plan.

Edited by Jon Snow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It wasn't me i dont think. I watched the game before I came on here to comment.  But they tried everything to slow the run game down but it didn't matter.  They washed out out tackles and put olinemen in our second level on linebackers.  We were toast from the jump because our fast DE's and linebackers got taken out of the play.  Perfect game plan.

Whoever said this defense is like the colts with Freeney and Mathis is pretty much on point.  And our offense isn’t prime manning led colts. If we can get a two score lead we are fine but if we need a stop in a close game we aren’t likely to get it.  I thought If we had recovered that fumble on the kickoff after it was 14-7 the game would have looked completely different. We likely would have scored again to make it 21-7 which would have forced Washington to pass more. We all know that Rivera’s teams suck at coming from behind and Heinecke was way too comfortable because they never got out of their game plan. We were totally outcoached yesterday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Honestly, even worse... I think he let the booing of the fans as the punter was trotting out change his mind. I think the change of mind was the right call but had the boos not rained down I honestly think they would've gone through with the punt.

I just think Rhule and company are in over their heads. Seeing them out-coached by Ron Rivera cemented that for me.

 

Exactly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...