Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pot Roast ripping into Defense on sidelines Sunday


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Props to Pot Roast...

 

Belichick would cut a player or two, send a message...

...Rhule would do well to emulate the best that ever lived.  

Rhule isn’t man enough, he’s not a real coach. Needs to go back to college and coach boys because he can’t coach men!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, PandaMan said:

Reminds me of my last job.  Our boss would tell my buddy to “step up” constantly, but with no actual instruction on how to do so.  He ended up getting fired.  Poor guy

I worked in personal finance for a while. Our Step-by-step guidance on selling a motorist assistance add-on product was “step 1: it sells itself. Get out there and sell!”. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, AU-panther said:

A lot of times when a defense is getting gashed in the running game it’s not just about effort or having bigger players, it’s about discipline.

Gap responsibility and doing your assignment is paramount and my guess is this is why you are hearing all of these comments about leadership needing to hold people accountable.

 

That's coaching. They couldn't counter the zone blocking and players were confused and looking for answers on the field.

Prototypes are for a reason. When they started fundamentally picking apart Dom Capers 3-4 he had nowhere to hide. Ron tried to go 3-4 a while there. 

To me it should be less of a scheme and more of a personell package according to who's on the field because we're running a multifaceted 4-3 with some hybrid players.

We've got to go after DT and OL to get back to big boy ball this coming season.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rippadonn said:

That's coaching. They couldn't counter the zone blocking and players were confused and looking for answers on the field.

Prototypes are for a reason. When they started fundamentally picking apart Dom Capers 3-4 he had nowhere to hide. Ron tried to go 3-4 a while there. 

To me it should be less of a scheme and more of a personell package according to who's on the field because we're running a multifaceted 4-3 with some hybrid players.

We've got to go after DT and OL to get back to big boy ball this coming season.

We are 6th in the league in points allowed, but by all means lets go to big boy ball so we stop the few teams that run on us but then we can complain that we can't stop 75% of the teams that throw on us.

NFL Football Stats - NFL Team Opponent Points per Game | TeamRankings.com

Don't get me wrong, its never a bad idea to add talent, my point earlier is often when a team has sucess running on you its not just because your players aren't "big enough", often players are following their assignments.

Personally I think this is why there has been all this chatter of leaders have to hold people accountable.

 

 

Edited by AU-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't recall Belichick cutting players left and right to "send a message." 

Hard to win games when you cut starters.

SizzleBuzz will show his age and send you desktop computer pictures to try to validate his argument. Maybe even with an unfunny nickname sprinkled in here and there 

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...