Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Fire Joe Brady


GOAT
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Bunskie said:

What I don't understand is how in our first year with our current coaching staff, the team seemed to be playing so hard and competitive each game. While the defence sucked - it improved over the season to even touching elite status to start out this 2nd year... How did everything fall off a cliff so hard? Did we just get figured out? Locker room lost? All the above?

NFL can smell when you're not NFL material and proceed to make you pay. They then pass around the cliff notes on your ars.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule is not the one who chose Joe brady. Tepper was the one that did. Matt Rhule should be given a chance to hire who he wants to be his OC. Rhule has his problems but let not be one of the teams that doesn't give the head coach time to build a winning team. I for one will at least let him choose his own OC. If that doesn't work out then thay can fire him.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, John2k2k said:

Rhule is not the one who chose Joe brady. Tepper was the one that did. Matt Rhule should be given a chance to hire who he wants to be his OC. Rhule has his problems but let not be one of the teams that doesn't give the head coach time to build a winning team. I for one will at least let him choose his own OC. If that doesn't work out then thay can fire him.

It's hard to build a team when you are consistently making missteps.  It's hard to say this team is any better than last year and it has CONSIDERABLY more talent.  That is on the coaching staff, particularly the head coach...especially one with as much pull in personnel matters as Rhule has.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

It's hard to build a team when you are consistently making missteps.  It's hard to say this team is any better than last year and it has CONSIDERABLY more talent.  That is on the coaching staff, particularly the head coach...especially one with as much pull in personnel matters as Rhule has.

Yeah he wanted full control and now he has to live with those decisions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not surprised. He and Rhule just don't seem to be on the same page at all and the offense has been a mess since Rhule started dictating a more run focused approach. Doing it during the bye week made sense. Let's see if the offense improves with the change. If it doesn't we gotta fire Rhule. I do think this move being made mid-season may very well indicate that Rhule's seat kay he significantly warmer than most "sources" seem to believe.

Bradys like YO DAWG DIS MY TEAM WHERE MUH NEWPORTS AND CHAINS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...