Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nobody talking about Minshew?


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, trueblade said:

1. Even Darnold looked good against the Jets.

2. Minshew's problem has always been consistency. He'll look great a couple of games, then look terrible. You want to see it for more than one week. If anything, his performance today might cause Hurts's ankle to need a little more time to heal.

 

He's played for the JAGS!  Is that the organization you want to judge for consistency?  Really?

The stat you need to understand is that for the two years Minshew was in Jacksonville they only won 7 games.  However, despite benching him repeatedly they won ZERO games with him on the bench.

Here's a little deeper dive into his stats:

image.thumb.png.f3d6fc9be94948a23f850fd1aec1a23a.png

There are three stats there which I find interesting.

One, his completion percentage.  It increased dramatically in year two.  That's a great sign for a young QB growing into the NFL.

Two, his TD%.  At 4.6 for his career, it looks very much like another QB who is good but not great, Ryan Tannehill.    Good but not great?  I can stand a bit of that.

Three, his INT%.  At 1.4 for his career, it's amazing.  Rodgers is one of the best you'll ever see at not turning it over, and his career average is 1.3%.  Tom Brady is at 1.8%.

Completes the ball, throws TD's, doesn't throw picks?  Yes please.

Big fan of his.  I wanted him way, way more than Darnold.  For reference, take a look at the guy we traded for on those same stats.

image.thumb.png.e5866abb6a805cc4ead5eece15c7fe61.png

 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Minshew his rookie year, 16tds-5int the following year, def has shown more than most your JAG qbs 

Definitely  a jag Qb.. I'm glad he had a okay rookie year.. Still he is a backup with little to no physical talent to speak of.. If you want a poor man's Ryan Fitzpatrick have at it..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Definitely  a jag Qb.. I'm glad he had a okay rookie year.. Still he is a backup with little to no physical talent to speak of.. If you want a poor man's Ryan Fitzpatrick have at it..

Idk how that qualifies as ok when most your top picks are generally throwing more ints than tds out the gate. I’d like to see Minshew get the chances guys like Sam and Teddy got before I’d label him a career backup 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Minshew his rookie year, 16tds-5int the following year, def has shown more than most your JAG qbs 

Your posting stats without context, he put up a bunch of garbage time numbers while getting beat by double digits. Both Luton and Glennon came in and also had good games statistically.
 

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Idk how that qualifies as ok when most your top picks are generally throwing more ints than tds out the gate. I’d like to see Minshew get the chances guys like Sam and Teddy got before I’d label him a career backup 

That's your opinion.. I think he got 2 years to prove he was the QB and played them into Lawrence .. Again he was undrafted for a reason.. I don't understand why you can't see the limitations in having a QB with below avg. Arm talent and way below avg. Physical attributes... This is way he wasn't as wanted by most teams and why he isn't worth what other QB are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...